My ancestors were kings and queens?

That just makes you one of the millions of people who can trace their ancestry to royalty. It doesn't mean anything. If you were ACTUAL royalty, you would know it. What can you do about it? Brag about it. It might get you a date once in a while. And...you might be wrong, anyway...but if you have found that many different royals in your background, you've probably found at least one or two that are genuine.

We are all descended from royalty. It's been estimated that, today, every single person of British ancestry in the UK is a descendant of King Edward III, which means they are descendants of a lot of other royals as well -- all of Edward's royal ancestors. It doesn't mean anything. Merely being descended from royals doesn't make YOU royal. Even some of the UK Queen's close relatives are not royal, so you can imagine how distant from being royal you -- and the rest of us -- are. By the way, I'm suspicious of any genealogist who claims to trace someone's ancestry back to Charlemagne or even somewhat more recently. To be really sure of the bloodlines, you need to spend a lot of time examining very old archival documents with expertise in such subjects as medieval paleography, which requires a lot of study and training.

So were mine. There is nothing you can do about it Michael, you are not going to change history. Edit........The problem occurs when your line passes through the female side of the family. It becomes diluted, loses it's strength and most of it's meaning.

If they prove to be accurate and legitimate.. then you have an accurate and legitimate family history of being descended from Kings and Queens... welcome to the club.

Very likely nothing at all. Once you get your proof together you could contact those houses but, really, don't expect much.

cool