What's the deal for other British royal other than Prince Charles, Prince of Wales regarding the succession?
-
I just figured out that the new rule to the Commonwealth realms succession is only applied to Charlie's descendants. Does it mean his entire relatives excluding him and his descendants will still to follow the male primogeniture? It's a good news, isn't it? Say, there had a royal wipeout and the nearest to line of succession to the throne were Prince Edward, Earl of Wessex's children, who would take the crown? The elder daughter or the younger son since the new law only applied to Prince Charles descendants and he had no legitimate surviving descendants left? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Succession_to_the_British_throne
-
Answer:
The succession-law changes apply to the children born to Princes William and Harry. The succession for all the others remain as-is. Thus, if Princes Charles, Andrew, and Edward (along with their children) were eliminated, it would be James (Viscount Severn) who would be the next King (with Princess Anne as Regent if he were underage). So the new succession reads thus: Charles (Prince of Wales) William William's oldest child Willliam's younger child Harry Harry's oldest child Harry's younger child Andrew (Duke of York) Beatrice Eugenie Edward (Earl of Wessex) James Louise Anne (Princess Royal) Peter Savannah (child due next year) Zara
Queen Elizabeth at Yahoo! Answers Visit the source
Other answers
Yes, while the descendants of Prince Charles will enjoy Equal Primogeniture, other members of the Royal Family are still bound by Male Primogeniture. Assuming something terrible happens, and William, Harry, Beatrice and Eugenie all die without leaving legitimate descendants, the Throne would go eventually go to James, Viscount Severn and NOT Lady Louise - his elder sister. Firstly, the laws (even if they did concern all members of the Royal Family) are not retroactive, so Louise and James' positions wouldn't change in any case. Secondly, since members of the Royal Family other than the descendants of Prince Charles would still be governed by Male Primogeniture laws, James would always be ahead of his sister. Of course, should the aforementioned scenario actually come to life, there is little doubt that all countries of the Realm will issue further declarations or Acts of Parliament to establish equal primogeniture among Prince Edward's descendants as well; in that case, who would ascend to the Throne would depend on whether the changes are retroactive, or not. - If they are retroactive, Lady Louise will move ahead of her brother in the Line of Succession. There is a precedence; when Equal Primogeniture was adopted in Sweden, it was made retroactive for the King's descendants, so Prince Carl Philip (who was born a Crown Prince as the only son of the King) lost his place in favour of his elder sister Victoria. - If the changes are not retroactive, than James would ascend to the Throne. There is a precedence for this as well; when Equal Primogeniture wad adopted in Norway, it was not made retroactive, so Crown Prince Haakon didn't lose his place in favour of his older sister, Princess Martha Louise.
It means that the order of the succession will remain as it was for everyone except future descendants of Prince Charles via his sons William and Harry. In other words, though the law is changing, the people to whom the change will apply have not yet been born. Your question regarding a royal wipeout is a good one. I pointed out yesterday that if William and Harry both died without producing children, the succession would presumably jump to Prince Andrew, just as it always would have, even though Princess Anne is older, because the change is not retroactive. In your scenario, Parliament would have to decide what to do. My guess is that Lady Louise would be chosen to succeed and that the law would be rewritten for her sake and to ensure absolute primogeniture for her descendants and those of her younger brother should she have no children of her own.
Lili
They talk about equality... which is laughable And the politicians talk about modernising the Royal family... how about abolishing it
Related Q & A:
- What's around the area of Royal Holloway?Best solution by royalholloway.ac.uk
- What's the deal with the security certificate?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
- What's the deal with Vancouver?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
- What's Charles Rennie Mackintosh famous for?Best solution by Answerbag.com
- What's the deal with 3d?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
Just Added Q & A:
- How many active mobile subscribers are there in China?Best solution by Quora
- How to find the right vacation?Best solution by bookit.com
- How To Make Your Own Primer?Best solution by thekrazycouponlady.com
- How do you get the domain & range?Best solution by ChaCha
- How do you open pop up blockers?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
For every problem there is a solution! Proved by Solucija.
-
Got an issue and looking for advice?
-
Ask Solucija to search every corner of the Web for help.
-
Get workable solutions and helpful tips in a moment.
Just ask Solucija about an issue you face and immediately get a list of ready solutions, answers and tips from other Internet users. We always provide the most suitable and complete answer to your question at the top, along with a few good alternatives below.