Im i entitled to redundancy pay?
-
my company is relocating and i've only been there for a year, ive been sent a package that says i will be entitled to 25% of my annual pay. also a girl who has only been there for 6 months is also gettin this package. but ive lookied on the net and it says u have to work a minumum of 2 yrs to be entitled to redundancy pay. i questioned the manager and she said they are offering so much because then people will leave and then they will have to train completley new people for a few months till they close and they cant waste their time doing that. im i being taken for a ride and hanging around for nothing?
-
Answer:
Sorry, you're getting more than the law entitles you to, and you are asking if you are being taken for a ride? Basically, you will get 3 months salary when the firm closes, plus the salary you will get paid up until the firm closes. So, you can take 3 months after the firm closes to find another job, and you will be as well off as you are now. I'd say they were being very generous, and I'd stick with it!
K C at Yahoo! Answers Visit the source
Other answers
It sounds like they are offering you a very good deal. Three month's pay for a redundancy settlement after only a year is well above the norm.
Otter
Simple answer- no- you have to have worked at your company for at least 2 years before you are entitled to redundancy pay.
Jessica
What you have read on the net is right. You LEGALLY have to be working for a company for solid 2 years before you get anything. Look for another job FAST, unless you want to relocate with the company.
k
Just to clarify what others have said... Legally you have to have worked there for a length of time before you are ENTITLED to anything. This does not mean that the company can't choose to offer you something. Also, legally, the usual requirement is to give you 1 WEEKS pay for every YEAR you have worked. 3 months salary after just a year is an excellent offer. However, what you have said doesn't really make much sense. The firm is offering a high amount so that employees will leave the firm. The firm will then need to train new people for a few months till they close "and they cant waste their time doing that". I don't understand that bit. Why not just keep on the people who are taking redundancy until the firm relocates? Also, is the firm simply relocating? If so, why are they trying to get rid of staff? There is nothing to say that you can't accept the offer, start looking for another job and work until the firm closes.
Duke75
Related Q & A:
- Why do I keep getting booted out of Yahoo IM?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
- When was redundancy pay first introduced?Best solution by en.wikipedia.org
- How do i scan something? First time using a scaner and i dont think im doing it right. help. thanks?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
- What is Cyclic Redundancy Check and can I still download?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
- Are you entitled to sick pay if you work full time?Best solution by nidirect.gov.uk
Just Added Q & A:
- How many active mobile subscribers are there in China?Best solution by Quora
- How to find the right vacation?Best solution by bookit.com
- How To Make Your Own Primer?Best solution by thekrazycouponlady.com
- How do you get the domain & range?Best solution by ChaCha
- How do you open pop up blockers?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
For every problem there is a solution! Proved by Solucija.
-
Got an issue and looking for advice?
-
Ask Solucija to search every corner of the Web for help.
-
Get workable solutions and helpful tips in a moment.
Just ask Solucija about an issue you face and immediately get a list of ready solutions, answers and tips from other Internet users. We always provide the most suitable and complete answer to your question at the top, along with a few good alternatives below.