Who of the royals will have a child in near future?

How can I prevent my future child from getting ANY vaccinations until the child is over 3 to 4 years old?

  • I have read of so many parents first-hand examples of where their child was a 'normal' child, developing 'normally', and then suddenly after a vaccination they descended into Autism or some other hellish disorder just a few hours after the vaccination. The doctors involved keep stating that its other factors such as heredity or environmental pollution (or little green aliens, or some other crap like that), but the parents know darn well that there's something in those vaccines that is causing all the damage to developing children. So if vaccines cause genetic damage to the developing children, then at what age does the child's development progress to such a level where introduction to the toxins in a typical vaccine no longer cause childhood autism, etc? It seems that around the ages of 3 to 4 are when most of the mental development in children have concretely formed and they are no longer at risk of getting immunization-caused autism disorder. Now here's the problem: Without these childhood vaccinations the child is 100% at risk from catching deadly viruses from other children, so during these years the child will need to be kept 100% away from all other children, almost like the way a child born without an immune system is kept in a sterile bubble. Yes, it may be inconvenient but then so is having a child who is incapable to taking care of themselves in later life due to severe complications due to autism. So my question is this: Short of moving the entire family to the African Serengeti, is there any LEGAL way to prevent / stop your developing child from being given vaccinations until they are 3 to 4 years of age?

  • Answer:

    I didn't know vaccine-free kids had to be kept away from other children. Hmm...My vaccine-free kids have lived completely normal lives. I'm glad I didn't know about that rule. Nobody in real life knows we don't vaccinate our kids (other than their doctor and the school secretary who handles the paperwork). How would they find out? Keep your mouth shut about it, and you'll be fine. There is no age at which vaccines are completely safe. Google "Stephanie Arnold autism" for just one example. Vaccines aren't required by law for children, except for daycare and school. 48 states (all except Mississippi and West Virginia) allow for exemptions to the school and daycare vaccine requirements. If you plan on keeping your child out of daycare and school for the first 4 years, you won't even have to fill out an exemption form. So NOTHING has to be done, except at the hospital (if you choose a hospital birth), where you will have to make sure they don't give the hepatitis B vaccine. I also don't understand your reasoning--if you and just about everybody in your age group only received the tetanus, polio, and smallpox vaccines, why do you think kids today are at such a high risk if they are not vaccinated for the other diseases? By the way, the smallpox vaccine is not given anymore, polio hasn't been an issue since 1979, and tetanus is non-communicable.

honesty_... at Yahoo! Answers Visit the source

Was this solution helpful to you?

Other answers

This is all a lie. The study of the connection between autism and vaccinations has been proven to have been fradulant. The reason parent notice that their children were fine until after the vaccinations is because often times an autistic child will seem normal until they start getting into talking, walking and the like. However, if you don't want to keep your child safe from the reemergence of old diseases like whooping cough thanks to parents who don't vaccinate their kids and would like to risk your childs death, ask for a religious exemption. They are not allowed to ask your religion.

Shawn

First of all, you should know that the Autism link to vaccines was shown to be a hoax, and the medical expert who found it lost his medical license. Parents "know" a lot of things about vaccines and other things which are false (and can be proven to be false). Much of the information, especially on the internet, is dated, not at all scientific, and biased. If you don't want to vaccinate, you need to find a pediatrician who agrees with your philosophy. Many pediatricians will not care for patients if the parents choose not to vaccinate. And it is vitally important to breastfeed exclusively for 6-8 months, and continue to breastfeed for the long term (2 years or more). This will provide your child with some protection as long as breastfeeding continues. You cannot (and will not want to) keep your child isolated for several years. A father can be exposed to pertussis (whooping cough) at work and bring it home. Parents can bring home many other diseases as well. So isolating a child from other children is not particularly helpful. And think, too, about how a child can grow up to be social and well rounded without social interaction with peers as well as adults. A child without social interaction for 3-4 years will be a maladjusted child. Vaccines are not given without parental permission, and it is perfectly legal not to give them. Some people limit vaccines in the early years or space them out. A concerned parent should have a thoughtful, in depth discussion with a trusted physician before making any decisions. EDIT: One of the points here is that it is not enough to keep your child away from other children. For your child's protection, you need to know that any adult-including you-can bring illness in to your child. Many researchers theorize that allergies are exploding because of the use of artificial foods (formulas) and the increasing number of toxins in our world. Regarding Autism itself: new research is indicating that there are changes in the brain that indicate Autism and can be found as young as 6 months. I think that eventually we are going to find that there is a genetic or chemical component. This is not meant to be critical or judgmental, just to inform. But you need to think seriously about how a child can grow up to be able to form friendships and normal human bonds without interaction with anyone but parents for 4 years. Just one more note: You seem to totally discount the immunities conferred to general illnesses (mumps, measles, etc.) as well as to illnesses 'going around' (flus, viruses that cause the common cold, ear infections). Breastmilk protects the child for *the entire time* s/he is breastfed, strengthening the immune system *forever*. It is vitally important to exclusively breastfeed until solids are started after the middle of the first year, and to continue indefinitely.

Ellen

You're wrong. 1.Just because something occurs *after* vaccination does not mean it occurred *because* of vaccination. 2. There is no link between vaccines and autism. 3. Vaccines don't cause "genetic damage to the developing children" Delaying vaccines at a time when a child needs it the most is illogical. 4. I don't think you know what a toxin is. Nothing in those vaccines are in harmful amounts- there is nothing really in there that you are not exposed to in the environment or in the food you in in far greater amounts. 5. Denying your child social interaction with other children is likely to cause your child problems. You're being completely irrational 6. There is no link between vaccines and allergies. Look at countries where they heavily vaccination - e.g. South America; they have a very low instance of allergies. The difference? Parasitic infections. Google "hygiene hypothesis". 7. Most of the increase in autism can be attributed to broadening of the definition and general medical awareness. There is no valid link between vaccines and autism. 8. An autistic child isn't a dead child. 9. " but children who are still developing (growing brain neurons, etc), they need to be shielded from any potentially harmful non-natural stuff" And this is why we vaccinate. Why is it more logical to expose your child to the wild disease? There are no heavy toxic metals in vaccines. The dose matters. 10. Vaccines are not derived from peanut-derived ingredients. Also google "immunotherapy" your reasoning is stupid. Your irrational behaviour is going to have a damaging effect on your child; really, social services should should intervene. I don't think you can be reasoned with.

Rhianna does Medicine Year 3

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post_hoc_ergo_propter_hoc ...do you even understand that you are quoting blog comment spam? "die if they smell...baking" -- have you ever heard of such a thing in real life, can you find a single reputable source discussing such a phenomenon? Aren't you angry about being lied to? Doesn't "in 35 years 100% of all children will be diagnosed with autism" make you realise that you are reading nonsense...? Children are still developing at three and four. I would think it preferable to have a happy autistic child than a parent-messed-up one who was isolated from the world until 4. Do you have any conception of how permanently damaged such a child would be? You can just say no to vaccines, but, don't do it because of autism. That idea has been discredited over and over. You are falling for kookery, quackery, paranoid schizophrenics with blogs; it's nonsense. You lack media literacy.

K

STOP reading so much garbage and STOP stressing about it. I raised 3 children, they all had their vaccinations and they are extremely healthy.

Linda R

"..so during these years the child will need to be kept 100% away from all other children, almost like the way a child born without an immune system is kept in a sterile bubble. Yes, it may be inconvenient" You haven't thought this through...or maybe you have but your mental faculties aren't up to child-rearing. Based on reading further, I'm leaning toward the latter. Edit: Pindar, who is "the GMC"? I know he's suing the BMJ and Brian Deer, but he's sued Deer before. He dropped the charges and paid everyone's legal fees. I'd venture it will be much the same this time around as well.

Nate

You're the parent, so you can say no. The good news for you is that your child will have a great deal of protection, thanks to the rest of the parents who do vaccinate. Nevertheless, there is still the chance of exposure to illnesses that are preventable by vaccines. It's commendable that you are willing to keep the child completely away from other children to prevent exposure (and to keep from infecting others) but 4 years is a long time. I would worry more about the effect on the child's social development than about concerns about vaccine safety. Are you really saying that your child would never be around other children for 4 years? Will he or she be confined to the house during that time? By the way, whenever your child reaches the age you choose to vaccinate, he or she may not be recommended to get certain ones that protect very young children. For example, pneumococcal disease and invasive Hib are most common in children under 5. If your child makes it to that age without those infections, and is otherwise healthy, those vaccines wouldn't be recommended. FYI, before vaccination, as many as 1 in 200 children per year were affected by these infections, and many of the ones who survived were left with permanent damage. Many parents with similar concerns choose to get at least some of the vaccines. Pediatricians that work with such parents usually do recommend that they get these particular vaccines, even if they delay some of the others. __________ Just watched most of the 15 minute video rant you posted the link to. Interesting, if unhelpful unconnected string of accusations and bouncing all over the place from our bodies are mostly water and we don't study water (????) to the inquisition. Oh, and autism is more frequent now and the ONLY thing that has changed in the last 20 or whatever she said years is the number of vaccines children get. Huh? How about the average age of parents at childbirth going up as people delay childbearing? How about a thousand other things that have changed in our society? I wouldn't put much stock in it. How about reading this instead? http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vac-gen/whatifstop.htm

lak

Yes the link to autism is true. The doctor who was vilified and made an example of ,Dr Wakefield has recently had his work verified and is currently suing the GMC, although you won't read the in main stream media. Vaccinations are purely voluntary , you just say no thanks. but don't just put them off until 4 or 5 scrap the idea totally. And just let your child be normal, ny children are vaccine free and have rarely been sick,just a very occasional sore throat .

Pindar

I think you need to take a few to a few biology lessons, learn about vaccinations and how they work and how in most cases they DO NOT cause issues..... You're making yourself sound like a complete utter moron. Babies would die if they where made to wait until 3-4 years of age for vaccinations, hence why they are given at different and specific ages. If you truly believe injections cause autism then you are wrong. That study into the MMR was a fake, a lie, there is no known link with it + autism. Merely around the age they have the vaccination is around the same time any autism symptoms start to reveal. GENETICS and VACCINATIONS are entirely different and vaccinations do not cause anything genetic to come out, appear, whatever. If a child has a genetic problem, it is written in their DNA and will come out regardless of vaccinations. You really are poorly educated.

Proud Mummy :)

Related Q & A:

Just Added Q & A:

Find solution

For every problem there is a solution! Proved by Solucija.

  • Got an issue and looking for advice?

  • Ask Solucija to search every corner of the Web for help.

  • Get workable solutions and helpful tips in a moment.

Just ask Solucija about an issue you face and immediately get a list of ready solutions, answers and tips from other Internet users. We always provide the most suitable and complete answer to your question at the top, along with a few good alternatives below.