Justices Limit Use of Identity Theft Law in Immigration Cases?
-
The Supreme Court on Monday rejected a favorite tool of prosecutors in immigration cases, ruling unanimously that a federal identity-theft law may not be used against many illegal workers who used false Social Security numbers to get jobs. The question in the case was whether workers who use fake identification numbers to commit some other crimes must know they belong to a real person to be subject to a two-year sentence extension for “aggravated identity theft.” The answer, the Supreme Court said, is yes. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/05/us/05immig.html?ref=politics anyone else think this is ridiculous?
-
Answer:
Yes,it is ridiculous. They may not "know" that the number belongs to an actual person but they sure "know" it doesn't belong to them.
Steve L at Yahoo! Answers Visit the source
Other answers
yes it is totally ridiculous. They claim they only the ones who claim not to know it is against the law, they will all claim that. Why is it when an American citizen gets charged with a crime, there are no excuses. We can not use ignorance of the law as an excuse. more illegals breaking the law and getting away with it. What happened to enforcing laws and American pride. I have seen a few cases where ignorance of the law has landed a citizen behind bars.
Kize
They're not taking into account about how badly it screws up the owner of that SS# when they file their taxes. The IRS still sees the money earned and reported by the illegals employment as being earned by the true SS# holder, and are held financially responsible for taxes owed on that income. I have always felt "I didn't know" was a child's excuse. The fact that in order to use that number they also had to use another name should have clued them in to think "Hey this may not be on the up. and up."
rlstaehle
The question in the case was whether workers who use fake identification numbers to commit some other crimes must know they belong to a real person to be subject to a two-year sentence extension for “aggravated identity theft.” ===================================== I see the reasoning... I don't like it though. We need a law that makes the use of any social security number that is not issued to that person a felonious attempt at fraud. We need something, and as Government has praised so often... can do attitudes are critical to solving these issues. Sadly we have a whole lot of 'oh dear's' in our government and I have a bad feeling... ===================================== And this is not a 'conservative thing'. It is the Federal Government doing it to the people... and massively.
Joel W
GREAT NEWS! Comes to prove that many illegal immigrants with fake IDs are victims of the growing immigration scams in the USA. Once they start cracking down on these scams, you'll see the numbers go way way down. http://www.usimmigrationsupport.org/immigrationscams.html Immigration Scams Being in a foreign country and not knowing the language can make immigrants more vulnerable to immigration scams. Immigrants may sometimes have difficulty distinguishing between individuals who provide legitimate immigration services and those that do not. It is easy for non-legit individuals to lease office space and set up what appears to be a legitimate business. Others set up more informal offices in their homes. Illegal immigrants may turn to someone they believe is an immigration consultant and seek legal advice from someone who is not qualified.
GreasyTony
I think the result is ridiculous but if it's a 9-0 decision then the conservatives must have felt Congress should make the law more clear. They won't, of course. But the Supreme Court shouldn't re-write laws just because our Congress refuses to do the right thing.
American citizen and taxpayer
Yes, but there are morons out there that sell their Identity. Some "Americans" will do anything for a buck, but not work!
La Mojarra
When a law leaves a lot of loopholes or even a single loophole generally the court rules that law invalid. The 'cure' for this is to have congress rewrite the law so that the loophole, or holes, are eliminated. Laws have to be exact, or as close to exact as possible. Without hearing the arguments for or against the current law it's impossible to know why the court arrived at their ruling. I believe in this case there was a question of 'provable intent'. I suspect this will be an easy fix....rewrite the law, and give it a first class set of dentures. I recommend it!! No kiddin'!
Noah H
Related Q & A:
- Cute Cases for iPhone?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
- How to use Hess's Law to calculate enthalpy for the reaction?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
- Why can't we use the Law of Conservation of Momentum to break the light barrier?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
- What is the German Government Doing to Limit Turkish Immigration?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
- Can my employer use lie detector or not? what about the law?Best solution by nolo.com
Just Added Q & A:
- How many active mobile subscribers are there in China?Best solution by Quora
- How to find the right vacation?Best solution by bookit.com
- How To Make Your Own Primer?Best solution by thekrazycouponlady.com
- How do you get the domain & range?Best solution by ChaCha
- How do you open pop up blockers?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
For every problem there is a solution! Proved by Solucija.
-
Got an issue and looking for advice?
-
Ask Solucija to search every corner of the Web for help.
-
Get workable solutions and helpful tips in a moment.
Just ask Solucija about an issue you face and immediately get a list of ready solutions, answers and tips from other Internet users. We always provide the most suitable and complete answer to your question at the top, along with a few good alternatives below.