Do you agree with our Nations largest Veteran organization?
-
Do you agree that our veterans have the right to speak out about illegals? Do you agree with the 30 page bulletin that educates more Americans about illegals and the dangers it puts this country in. Don't you agree that our veterans know more about this subject considering their experience serving our country? U.S. veterans attack illegal immigration Legion: 'America has a serious problem that needs to be addressed' --------------------------------------… Posted: January 13, 2009 9:41 pm Eastern By Drew Zahn © 2009 WorldNetDaily The nation's largest veterans organization released this week a policy bulletin that takes a firm stand against illegal immigration and calls on its members to hold elected officials accountable for implementing and enforcing U.S. immigration law. The 30-page bulletin is officially titled, "The American Legion Policy on Immigration: A Strategy to Address Illegal Immigration in the United States." "The American Legion members have served in the U.S. Armed Forces throughout the world so that Americans can be safe at home," the organization's website explains. "This gives them a unique perspective to the threat that open borders present to their homeland." "America is a nation built by immigrants and the American Legion recognizes and celebrates that," said National Commander David K. Rehbein in a press release. "We do take strong issue, however, with illegal immigration. It's a matter of national security. The 9/11 hijackers and three of the men who plotted to kill innocent Americans at Ft. Dix were perfect examples of terrorists exploiting our weak immigration laws and our lack of enforcement. This booklet is a good reminder that America has a serious problem that needs to be addressed." The booklet itself makes the Legion's position clear in a statement that stands alone on the first page. "The American Legion is opposed to any person or persons being in this country illegally, regardless of race, sex, creed, color or national origin," the bulletin states. "We believe the current laws governing immigration should be enforced impartially and equally." Originally founded in 1919 on an idea proposed by Theodore Roosevelt, Jr. (the president of the same name's eldest son), the Legion has now grown to a membership of more than 2.6 million wartime veterans organized in more than 14,000 posts nationwide. The policy bulletin explains, "Legionnaires subscribe to a creed, 'To uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States of America; to maintain law and order and to foster and perpetuate a 100 percent Americanism.' These words are recited in unison at Legion meetings and represent a continuing contract of service to benefit America and it is this commitment by Legionnaires that is the fuel for action on illegal immigration and other national security concerns facing this country." The Legion hopes the policy booklet will educate the American public on how "the security, economy and social fabric of the United States of America is seriously threatened by individuals who are illegally in this country." "Illegal immigration is not a victimless crime," the booklet states. "The poor, minorities, children and individuals with little education are particularly vulnerable. It causes an enormous drain on public services, depresses wages of American workers, and contributes to population growth that, in turn, contributes to school overcrowding and housing shortages. Directly and indirectly, U.S. taxpayers are paying for illegal immigration." In financial terms, the booklet cites a report by the Center for Immigration Studies that claims the average illegal alien household in 2003 paid approximately $4,200 in federal taxes while, on average, created $7,000 in costs at the federal level. In response to what it sees as a contributing factor to crime, terrorism, unemployment and depressed wages, the Legion proposes the following five-point strategy urging the federal government to enact the following steps: 1. Secure the borders and other points of entry in the United States, including construction of a physical barrier and sufficient Border Patrol presence. 2. Eliminate the jobs magnet and social services benefits that draw illegal immigrants to the U.S. by enforcing laws sanctioning employers who hire illegal aliens, implementing employment eligibility verification and eliminating government benefits for illegal aliens. 3. Eliminate amnesty laws that permit illegal aliens to break the law and remain in the U.S. 4. Reduce the U.S. illegal alien population by attrition through workplace enforcement, interagency and interstate cooperation, rejection of driver's license plans, mandating English as national language and establishing parameters for noncriminal deportations. 5. Screen and track foreign visitors legally entering the United States. The plan further calls for
-
Answer:
Yes I do. They articulate the same reasoning, common sense, and plan that 70% of the U.S. Citizens have passed on to their State and Government Representatives via writing, calling, and faxing to kill any form of amnesty/pathway to citizenship for illegals. This is also nothing less than the Americanization Movement that Teddy Roosevelt, Woodrow Wilson, and Louis Brandeis, James Madison, George Washington, in a letter to John Adams, and Alexander Hamiton among others. Teddy Roosevelt spoke in the manner of legal immigrants coming for a better life chief. Not illegals. In the snopes link you provided - the Feb. 1 1916 speech says it all. I would copy and paste, but the site won't allow me to. I found more on what TR has always said. "In the first place we should insist that if the immigrant who comes here in good faith becomes an American and assimilates himself to us, he shall be treated on an exact equality with everyone else, for it is an outrage to discriminate against any such man because of creed, or birthplace, or origin. But this is predicated upon the man's becoming in very fact an American, and nothing but an American...There can be no divided allegiance here. Any man who says he is an American, but something else also, isn't an American at all. We have room for but one flag, the American flag, and this excludes the red flag, which symbolizes all wars against liberty and civilization, just as much as it excludes any foreign flag of a nation to which we are hostile...We have room for but one language here, and that is the English language...and we have room for but one soul [sic] loyalty and that is a loyalty to the American people." "You cannot dedicate yourself to America unless you become in every respect and with every purpose of your will thoroughly Americans. You cannot become thoroughly Americans if you think of yourselves in groups. A man who thinks of himself as belonging to a particular national group in America has not yet become an American." "However great his outward conformity, the immigrant is not Americanized unless his interests and affections have become deeply rooted here. And we properly demand of the immigrant even more than this--he must be brought into complete harmony with our ideals and aspirations and cooperate with us for their attainment. Only when this has been done will he possess the national consciousness of an American." "In response to the mass immigration at the turn of the century Congress passed the Naturalization Act of 1906‑07, which strengthened citizenship requirements. Specifically, Congress required new citizens to be able to speak English and answer questions about American history and government. In addition, political opponents, such as anarchists, of the American "proposition" were forbidden to become citizens. Later in the century, the obligation to "serve in the Armed Forces of the United States when required by law" was added to the oath of citizenship. Historian Philip Gleason notes that interest in these issues "began to wane" with the immigration restrictions of the 1920s, until they were revived in the 1960s. With the new wave of immigration after changes in immigration law in 1965, one heard little about Americanization and much about cultural pluralism and multiculturalism. However, by the late 1990s, the idea of Americanization was slowly beginning to make a comeback. Two books, Assimilation, American Style, by Peter Salins, and The Unmaking of Americans: How Multiculturalism Has Undermined America's Assimilation Ethic, by John J. Miller, advocated support for the traditional approach to patriotic assimilation and Americanization. " To "Possess the National Consciousness of an American" (Louis Brandeis, July 4, 1915) http://www.cis.org/articles/cantigny/fonte.html
Mad Kat at Yahoo! Answers Visit the source
Other answers
I agree! My 11 month old knows more about illegals and the affects of their invasion than the pro illegals/libs.
catmaninmo II
Yes, I do agree with them, and I also appreciate their service to our country.
ItsJustMe
Good for them! We need more large organizations to speak up about the obvious. Staying quiet because you don't want to make waves since the Illigal immigrant groups claim racism at the drop of a hat if you question it. Screw em they're breaking the system.
breetai
That have seen more of the world than the rest of us and as a whole they are usually older and wiser.
YourLaHire
Completely agree.... These are the guys that fought and paid with blood to defend our freedoms and lives.. Everyone should listen to what they say, as they have sacrificed the most for this country...
No Amnesty
I agree. Take away incentives and they will not come. It was when they found out their babies were eligible for welfare that they came and stayed.
Sasori
Yes, I agree 100%, I fully support our veterans! I think all immigration both legal and illegal should be stopped all together. There are to many immigrants in America and we don't need to be overpopulated.
TC T
As a veteran myself, I agree 100 percent. I like what you found
tempthack02
I actually changed my avatar in honor of those who fought, and died defending my rights, and I agree with them on this 100%.
rlstaehle
Related Q & A:
- Was China the first country to attack the United Nations’ troops (in the Korea War) after the United Nations w?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
- What is the difference between a non-profit organization and a non-governmental organization?Best solution by maxwell.syr.edu
- What did the Leauge of Nations do the same as United Nations?Best solution by wiki.answers.com
- How many nations are members of The United Nations General Assembly ?Best solution by en.wikipedia.org
- Who is considered a disabled veteran?Best solution by irs.gov
Just Added Q & A:
- How many active mobile subscribers are there in China?Best solution by Quora
- How to find the right vacation?Best solution by bookit.com
- How To Make Your Own Primer?Best solution by thekrazycouponlady.com
- How do you get the domain & range?Best solution by ChaCha
- How do you open pop up blockers?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
For every problem there is a solution! Proved by Solucija.
-
Got an issue and looking for advice?
-
Ask Solucija to search every corner of the Web for help.
-
Get workable solutions and helpful tips in a moment.
Just ask Solucija about an issue you face and immediately get a list of ready solutions, answers and tips from other Internet users. We always provide the most suitable and complete answer to your question at the top, along with a few good alternatives below.