What are the disadvantages of 3D Cinema/Television?
-
What are the disadvantages of 3D Cinema/Television?
-
Answer:
@Tony, you are correct. AS 3D did occur to me, but I do not consider it a current technology since there is no consumer TV or Movie Cinema using auto-stereoscopic 3D and the commercial AS displays available are used only for very limited applications (e.g. product showcase in supermarket). @JS, Clearly you have not had any recent 3D cinema or television experience. Modern day 3D systems typically use polarized or shutterglass 3D technology that does not have red/blue colored lenses (as the older Anaglyph technology did). Valid disadvantages of current 3D technologies are: 1) Watching 3D content will always result in loss of brightness in some form or another regardless of what 3D technology you are using (e.g. polarized, shutterglass, etc.) 2) The glasses are uncomfortable for people who don't normally wear glasses, because those people are not used to wearing glasses and the novelty of it becomes a point of focus and annoyance 3) The glasses are uncomfortable for people who do normally wear glasses, because the 3D glasses must be worn over those existing glasses (unless 3D clip-on lenses are used) 4) Shutterglass 3D technology requires on-going maintenance (e.g. replacing or charging batteries). Passive 3D technology does not require much maintenance, but it is also rare to find on the consumer market (despite being the most popular choice for commercial theaters in North America). 5) The cost of adding or replacing shutterglasses for consumer 3D TV is expensive (e.g. $150 per pair) 6) For standard Cable TV broadcasts, it is not possible to achieve 1080i High Definition for 3D content using the existing cable TV standards. Instead, 3D content is broadcast in a lower resolution format (still looks good though). 7) 3D content can in some cases cause varying degrees of eye-strain to some viewers, especially after watching for long periods of time. Part of the technical reason for this is that the 3D imagery tricks your brain into thinking something is in front of the screen when in fact it is not. When your brain tries to focus on the physical space in front of the screen, there is a conflict because there is nothing physically there for your eyes to focus on, and this conflict can cause some discomfort and eye strain. It's similar to how crossing your eyes for an extended period of time can cause discomfort. Nowadays, film directors and 3D content producers are more careful and limit the number of pop-out effects (which are often seen as gimmicky anyway). A lot of the 3D effect is pushed into the background behind the scene, and this typically causes less eye-strain for the viewer.
Zach at Yahoo! Answers Visit the source
Other answers
3d cinema - it costs nearly $20 in my area for a ticket. The glasses don't quite fit properly (I already wear prescription glasses). I get a headache if I wear the glasses for too long. 3d TV - requires a large, higher-end TV, so if you just bought a non-3D TV, you gotta buy a new one. And you're out of luck entirely if you can't afford or fit a 50" or larger screen into your budget or house. Requires expensive 3d blu-ray player. Requires $100/pair 3d glasses for each person. Oh and 3d isn't standardized yet, so Sony 3d glasses won't work with Samsung's blu-ray players, etc. There are only 3 3d films available and 1 of them is only available if you buy a specific TV bundle, and the other 2 aren't in stores. There is no 3d TV content yet. I don't know how well the TV glasses work - every store I've ever been to with a 3d TV running, didn't have any glasses to try on. They keep breaking apparently. Yeah, that sounds good... Stupid industry should have learned its lesson from HD-DVD/Blu-ray and SACD/DVD-A, yet it's going to happily inflict yet another format war on consumers. Only this time, NO ONE is going to bother. The market has barely broken the 50% penetration mark for HDTV, and now they want everyone to jump to 3d? Best of all, I've heard a rumor a company has developed a mechanism for doing 3d TV without glasses - meaning all this current 3d TV stuff will be junk within the next few years. Whee!
PoohBearPenguin
well... 3D today honestly isn't at all what it's thought up to be. I hate how movies are coming out 3D: 1. glasses are ugly. 2. glasses make you dizzy. 3. one red and one blue side.. seriously? 4. you hear more ooohs and ahhs, and AHHs and crying by little kids. Oooh touch it touch it, by parents to children. Annoying!
JS
Actually there is one 3d format that does not cause loss of light. Autostereoscopic 3d televisions can do 3d without glasses. They work pretty well. Saw one once.
Tony R
Related Q & A:
- What are the disadvantages of Tourism?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
- What are the disadvantages of advocacy?Best solution by vertrauenbm09324bm0741s12010.pbworks.com
- What are the Disadvantages of integrated services?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
- What are the disadvantages of stock exchange for a company?Best solution by classroom.synonym.com
- What is the difference between 3d tv and 3d ready tv?Best solution by differencebetween.com
Just Added Q & A:
- How many active mobile subscribers are there in China?Best solution by Quora
- How to find the right vacation?Best solution by bookit.com
- How To Make Your Own Primer?Best solution by thekrazycouponlady.com
- How do you get the domain & range?Best solution by ChaCha
- How do you open pop up blockers?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
For every problem there is a solution! Proved by Solucija.
-
Got an issue and looking for advice?
-
Ask Solucija to search every corner of the Web for help.
-
Get workable solutions and helpful tips in a moment.
Just ask Solucija about an issue you face and immediately get a list of ready solutions, answers and tips from other Internet users. We always provide the most suitable and complete answer to your question at the top, along with a few good alternatives below.