What do I have to do to become a Physiotherapist in Canada?

Is this why Canada didn't become an autonomous nation sooner?

• Did Canada remain under British rule for so long because it didn't have a sizable enough population nor a sizable enough military to stand on its own as an autonomous, independent nation? Using terms analogous to a family, with Britain being considered the parent, would Canada be one of the less gifted, more clingy of the parent's children -- a child who needed more of the parent's nurturing and assistance for a longer amount of time before it could be on its own...whereas, America would be like the gifted child who struck out very independently at a young age and made it on its own without needing extra parental nurturing? I am fascinated with why a country as geographically large as Canada did not seek to pursue its independence as early as other North and South American countries did from their colonial "parents". It's made all the more fascinating by the fact that Canada still clings to its parent in terms of the Queen reigning in Canada. Any insight Canadians can provide me will be greatly appreciated.

• Answer:

  The USA was more the rebellious child, fleeing the rules of the parents. The USA was formed in large part by those seeking freedoms, mostly religious. England remained essentially catholic - the Church of England remained catholic in style, and England firmly resisted Protestant reforms. So, the people went to America - both Roman Catholics, and hard core Protestants too. That was not the case for Canada. Canada does not cling to Britain. As I have said many times, there are no longer any legal ties, and there have not been any effective ones since 1931. We share the Queen, but, legally she is just as much Canadian as she is British. Granted, she does live there most of the time. Some do see this as a tie, but, in fact, we have no ties whatsoever to the British monarchy - only to the Canadian one. Which just happens (by an accident of history) to be the same person. But, had the UK not changed the primogeniture laws, even that may not have continued, had William and Catherine a daughter before a son.