What do you think of Arabs inviting Israel “to follow the International Law”?

1967: Israel attacks Egypt. 1973: Arabs retaliate against Israel, which could (should have) gone further, unless a) Israel had nuclear missiles, b) USSR got into the problem, c) Anwar Sadat wouldn't betray its nation. Basically, if you read history carefully, you will notice that all countries in this world break international laws. You will also notice that Israel is only country to posses Nuclear Missiles in Middle East, which gives you a thought "they collect weapon, so they don't like peace".

oh god, who said israel has the right to live in Palestine? Palestine is for it's people not some foreigners called jewish!! you see they attacked Palestine and they are dividing the country they don't own?? isn't that ridicules and against the law? i don't know how dare UN divide Palestine between it's people and foreigners!!!! i'm not Arab but as a Person that wants the real peace, i think Israel people should move back to where they belong not attacking some where they don't own

Arabs may have been in violation of international laws in the past. Israel are in violation today or does this make them right in your eyes ?

Let us present the full picture of what happened in 1947 - which is what Israeli supporters deliberately avoid to do. Zionist fanatics, using bribe and threat massages against UN members to make them vote for a plan that will give a minority of Jewish immigrants, majority of lands in Palestine. The area carved by the UN vote for the creation of the Jewish state contained a total population of 1,008,800, consisting of 509,780 Arabs and 499,020 Jews (according to Ad Hoc Committee report, A/AC.14/32, dated 11 November 1947). Majority of those Jews were also not citizens of Palestine but illegal immigrants according to British official reports to the UN. So subjecting native population to the rule of minority of immigrants (and against the wishes of the majority) is a clear violation of the international law. Rejecting the plan is not a violation of the international law. As for attacking, you can't be more wrong my friend. Israel attacked the Arabs in Palestine before any Arab armies launched a defensive attempt to free the Arab territories held by Zionist thugs. Here, your own leader by his own words: "Until the British left, no Jewish settlement, however remote, was entered or seized by the Arabs, while the Haganah, under severe and frequent attack, captured many Arab positions and liberated Tiberias and Haifa, Jaffa and Safad” (Ben-Gurion, Rebirth and Destiny of Israel (N.Y.: Philosophical Library, 1954, p. 530). So Zionist fanatics accepted the plan, and the next day violated it by "liberating" territories allotted by the same UN vote to the Arab state. In 1967 Israel started the war by a surprise attack on Egypt. If Israel was justified in attacking Egypt for blocking of the Straits of Tiran to Israeli ships, then Hamas rockets into Israel are justified too. I love it when Israeli supporters speak from both sides of their mouths. Egypt closed the Straits to Israeli ships in response of Israeli forcible eviction of Arab families in the Syrian-Israeli demilitarized zone which is an act of war under the international law. Nasser asked UN troops to leave for their own safety after he received information that Israel was going to attack. And he wasn't wrong after all. But let us for a moment forget that Israel was in offensive in 1967. UN Resolution 242 notes the "inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war" regardless of whether the war in which the territory was acquired was offensive or defensive. General Assembly resolution 58/292 recognized the Palestinian sovereignty in the Palestinian occupied territories, yet you still use "liberating" as your first leaders and speak about the international law at the same time. So i guess you people there in Israel have a different type of international law. And 1973 war (the only war started by Arabs) was valid under Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations. The Secretary-General of the Arab League made it clear that there was no attempt to acquire new territories. But to restore and liberate all the occupied territories. So, is that all you can come up to justify the Israeli world record of violating the international law? If not, then i am giving you another chance to provide a logical and reasonable response for a change - instead of ranting and blocking. Can you do that my dear Israeli friend? ;)

Why do you keep asking such questions? Its a rant anyway! i answered you clearly last time but you chose to delete it for some reason, anyway the things you mentioned are wrong, a clear twist of historical facts.

First, in 1947 it's wasn't for the UN or anybody to tell the Palestinians to divide their land and sacrifice it for some invaders. Second, in 1967 israel was waiting for an excuse to start a war and they got it by the two Egyptian battalions that went to Sinai and this doesn't mean war cause if we wanted war we would have already gone to war without sending two battalions who definitely wouldn't have been able to start it and without warning the enemy that we are building up for a war and that's what happened on the 6th of October 1973! Thirdly, In 1973 we had to fight back to reclaim out land and it's the without any doubt our right to fight to take back our stolen land.

It's a start my dear. A good solid start. Greetings