Is militant Zionist pushing hard for war with Iran?

Do you find it not strange at all that the right-wingers in America and Israel and the right-wingers in Iran?

  • have no problems in calling for a war? Israel now has a right-wing prime minister that is willing to put pre-emptive war on the table. Netanyahu released a statement a week ago, expressing his concerns of the effect of Arab Spring will have on Israel's borders. He believes that "radical Islamists" in Gaza and the West Bank will be re-energized, thus pushing out secularists like the Fatah Party in the coming elections. The other main concern from the right wing Likud Party is Iran. Iran's president has made some very alarming statements in the past, but not to worry: The president in that country can't declare war. Ahmadinejad's foreign policy positions remains very hostile to Israel and America. He and other conservative hard-liners want to keep their ally Syria, which is why his government has offered assistance in quelling the democracy rioters. Iran is concerned about the changing geopolitics brought by the Arab Spring. Conservative hard-liners fear that Iran will be more isolated than ever, making the country vulnerable to a military attack. They've seen two wars in their neighborhood and they are about to lose an ally. There are also warheads pointed at them from Turkey's borders. Their concern for national security is driving them to build a nuclear weapon.

  • Answer:

    That's because right-wingers are nothing more than fascists in disguise.

JACK at Yahoo! Answers Visit the source

Was this solution helpful to you?

Other answers

Your understanding is too simplistic. Your attempt to equate Iran's radical totalitarian Muslim theocracy and Israels democratic liberal national secular government,compares chalk to cheese. Israel has never threatened to wipe any Nation off the Map.Iran does stop threatening a nuclear holocaust , Iran means what it says. Neither Iraq nor Turkey seek confrontation with Iran.Iran has no reason to develop nuclear military might,except for a megalomanic need for power. As for your views on Israel,they reflect a lack of understanding.Remember that Israel has been governed by coalitions for it's entire history.Likud is not even the largest party in the Knesset. Likud is also fairly centrist with at least two parties on it's right.

anvil

What is silly here is that you equate what you dub to be "right wingers" in Israel and the USA with "right wingers" in Iran, and assume that they are one and the same. Since Israel and the USA are Western style democracies and Iran is not, the very NOTION of a "right winger" is inherently different. Also, what is silly here is that you seem to think that a "call to war" or "engaging in war" is a "right wing" notion. The reality is that many people, not all of them labeled "right wingers", are concerned about Iran's push to going nuclear. That being the case, the LOGICAL course of action is to consider ALL possible options. There may be a way to solve it diplomatically, but that may not work. Thus, it is reasonable to at least CONSIDER a military option.

BMCR

From you: "Netanyahu released a statement a week ago, expressing his concerns of the effect of Arab Spring will have on Israel's borders. He believes that "radical Islamists" in Gaza and the West Bank will be re-energized, thus pushing out secularists like the Fatah Party in the coming elections. The other main concern from the right wing Likud Party is Iran." ) No place in Netanyahu's comments does he express goals of war. ) All his stated concerns are quite rational. ) They are NOT rightwing concerns, but majority of ALL Israelis would call these, basic Israeli security concerns. You're trying to tie in rightwing with rightwing, doesn't fly because Israel's rightwing is your basic democratic this platform vs. that one. Iran's rightwing is a totally different concept, which runs morality police to keep headscarves in place, and beats up it's protestors for wanting a vote. You make it clear in your Iranian paragraph why Israel would need to take out a nuclear Iranian project. It's not a premptive war strike. They wouldn't be declaring war, nor stating that Iran was declaring war. It's a grey area without the declarations. Iran's concern I'd argue isn't "national security." No one was threatening them with nukes. Their concern is regional domination. So Arab countries are VERY worried about a nuclear Iran unbalancing the region, as well as much of the rest of the world.

Short and sweet

To have a rightwing, you need a leftwing. Iran's dictatorship kills it's leftwing. Israel's a democracy dude.

Mad

Related Q & A:

Just Added Q & A:

Find solution

For every problem there is a solution! Proved by Solucija.

  • Got an issue and looking for advice?

  • Ask Solucija to search every corner of the Web for help.

  • Get workable solutions and helpful tips in a moment.

Just ask Solucija about an issue you face and immediately get a list of ready solutions, answers and tips from other Internet users. We always provide the most suitable and complete answer to your question at the top, along with a few good alternatives below.