Why can't republicans debate Obamas politics with facts? Like his health care plan?

Because "government-run" healthcare doesn't always work. Look at Cuba (decrepit facilities) or Canada (long waits). Would you enjoy paying 60% in taxes? Then again, tax hikes are nothing new to Democrats like you, who don't even pay taxes.

FACT: Socialism is WRONG for our free country. Next question?

If you want to know why government ran healthcare if bad then just look at Canada or Europe. Enough said.

Do your own research! Look at the VA Administration! THey have the worse care for veterans! I know. my father used to go to a local VA hospital. THey suck.

To start with, It gives health care to people who have no legal right to be in this country. Since most of his promises have thus far turned out to be bald faced lies, I'll bet that before the end of his term, that lying, racist ex-crackhead Marxist Kenyan will be pushing universal health care. His plans do nothing more than cater to the societal parasites we call Democrats who want to enjoy the good life without working for it.

Socialism never works.

Because Obamas rhetoric isnt based in facts either. The audacity of Obama's rhetoric is amazing, somehow a tax cut for 95% of Americans' turned into the re-introduction of welfare. Using the same technique Obama will attempt a stealth takeover of the health care system. It will start with "health care reform" and a promise to let you keep your current insurance. In the following excerpt from Human Events Tony Blankley, commenting on Tom Daschle's book, explains how "19 words would spell the end of independent private-sector health care in America." On Page 179, he writes, "The Federal Health Board wouldn't be a regulatory agency, but its recommendations would have teeth because all federal health programs would have to abide by them." But here is the kicker: Although his board technically would have no say on the 68 percent of health care that is provided through the private sector, at the bottom of Page 179, Daschle modestly adds: "Congress could opt to go further with the Board's recommendations. It could, for example, link the tax exclusion for health insurance to insurance that complies with the Board's recommendation." Those last 19 words would spell the end of independent private-sector health care in America. Obviously, no health insurance would be sold if it were denied the tax deduction. Thus, every policy, every standard decided by this board would be the law of the land for every drug company, every hospital, every doctor and every health insurance company. Indeed, 20 pages later, in the section in which he identifies "losers" under his plan, Daschle is admirably candid. Among the explicit "losers,” he includes: "Doctors and patients might resent any encroachment on their ability to choose certain treatments, even if they are expensive or ineffectual compared to alternatives. Some insurers might object to new rules that restrict their coverage decisions. And the health-care industry would have to reconsider its business plan (emphasis added)." That is to say, they can stay in business and deliver their services, but only as the government bureaucrats say they may. They no longer would be genuinely independent. Say goodbye to freedom of choice, the government bureaucrats will now decide what treatment your doctor will be allowed to give you. In fact we are already part way down the road to universal health care, The Dems are working from the margins. Congress recently reauthorized SCHIP and now allows some states to cover adults under this "children's" program and now there is talk of letting those 55 years of age opt into medicare. It won't be long before every age group will be looking to the government for health care and then it will be too late.

How about the fact that we are approximately 10 trillion in debt, and we are talking about the government taking on 1/7th of the nation's economy? Is that factual enough?

Maybe if obama actually put out a detailed plan instead of general, contradictory rhetoric it could be evaluated.