How can I get Karl Marx small statue?

Where karl marx and Friedrich Engeles ahead of there time?

  • with the adoption of half of marx and engeles theories how long till we get to land-ownership and the means of production along with inheratance laws. It is a natural progression for all people to share the wealth . We all no that people are starving all over the world and we have the means to help and do little to help .We have made great strides in production of food and basic medical care along with shelter and infra-structure its is then incumbent upon us to take the next step and provide as a hole for the world.Explotation of resources and workers only provides for a few who hoard billions in resources and money that only help them selves .who needs to have that much power over everyone. Absolute power corupts unless you are very kind and then soomeone will take your wealth and power at the first chance they get . A rich man is nuts if he gives away the family fortune docters attorneys and judges keep this from happening .So a few live lavishly while poor starve by the millions

  • Answer:

    i think ure right , and why let them starve, guud question?

playtoof... at Yahoo! Answers Visit the source

Was this solution helpful to you?

Other answers

Be realistic, people are not perfect. There will never be a utopian happy go lucky world. What do you say to the people who work harder or contribute more and cannot be rewarded because they have to provide for those who do not contribute equally? Marxist and socialist systems have repeatedly shown that due to human nature (people will always want more for themselves, their family, friends, race, party, group, etc...) they are inherently flawed. There will always be favoritism and corruption as long as people are trusted to administer government. That will always run contrary to communist and socialist ideals. I think a democratic, capitalist society is the most effective system devised so far. Of course, due to the same natural human flaws, it is not perfect. But it can be improved and changed, as a democratic society allows for its constituents to hold representatives accountable and vote them out or pressure for ideals they desire. Our system, I believe, is more in tune with human nature. The flaws and inequities in our system require active popular participation and awareness to correct.

alieneddiexxx

You like the Theory this is clear, please think about the adherents of this Theory managed to kill more human beings than Adolf Hitler. Land reform killed Ukrainians by the Millions. The ends justified the means. Cambodia and Cuba. Explain How Castro got his Millions as is true with any Marxist dictator. Tell us about Zimbabwe where a country that used to EXPORT FOOD to Africa in the past because of efficient farming methods now imports food and a loaf of bread takes a wheel barrel of money to obtain.The ends justify the means. One must first have wealth in order to share it. Communists steal from everyone and give it to them selves. That is what Nationalization is all about.

driveranderson

I suggest you practice what you preach Go down to the homeless shelter, take 9 homeless people. Divide all of your belongings between yourselves evenly. Now, every payday, do the same thing. After a while, you will realize that it is not worth it for you to go to work anymore, so you will stop working. Now, we will have 10 homeless people. Socialism doesn't work!

nicolasraage

Where people are starving around the world these days the principle cause is the adoption of Marxist theories by one thick headed bunch of dolts after another. In China, the direct result of adopting communism was that 20-30 million people starved to death during the "Great Leap Forward." While this was probably the numerically largest catastrophe brought about by communism the relative death toll was even worse in other areas burdened by Marxism. The hideous famines in Ethiopia were created by the Marxist regime that overthrew the monarchy and the killing fields of Cambodia's Khymer Rouge come immediately to mind. Marx was wrong about just about everything. His dialectic, which purports to explain history, has been universally rejected by scholars as arrant nonsense. His economic notions of "surplus value" are utterly wrong and essentially meaningless drivel. Marx, you may remember, predicted that Germany or some other highly industrialized nation would be the first nation to have a communist revolution. But Communism has never been implemented by a spontaneous revolution in any industrialized nation. When part of Germany became Communist it was only because the guns of the Soviets were to the heads of the people. Marxisam is an idea that has been tried, multiple times, in a variety of circumstances and failed. It has been tossed on the trash heap of history by the very people who lived under it.

Rillifane

I agree with the person who talked about the 9 homeless people becoming 10 homeless people. Socialism does not work at all. I mean, sure, at first it seems great, on paper. But when you put it into motion, you can see it just isn't meant to be.

d1nonlygiantsfan

Just Added Q & A:

Find solution

For every problem there is a solution! Proved by Solucija.

  • Got an issue and looking for advice?

  • Ask Solucija to search every corner of the Web for help.

  • Get workable solutions and helpful tips in a moment.

Just ask Solucija about an issue you face and immediately get a list of ready solutions, answers and tips from other Internet users. We always provide the most suitable and complete answer to your question at the top, along with a few good alternatives below.