CONS: Where is your proof that George Zimmerman's nose was broken on the night of Feb. 26?

I've broken my nose before...I had no external signs until the next day when I had minor bruising. I find it odd you ignored the blood red gash on the back of his head (actually I'm not surprised)

Al Sharpton, a Democrat is trying to use this case to start a race riot at the request of his boss Barack Obama. http://ionenewsone.files.wordpress.com/2011/09/600-obama.jpeg

Why was Martin selling stolen jewelry?

There is evidence that it was bleeding. I do not recall the conservatives claiming it was broken. What difference does it make? Those tapes are unclear and poor evidence until enhanced. Then they do show injuries. The paramedics on the scene also noted injuries to the back of his head and nose. Your argument is absurd. @ Of course. Name calling and insults always serve to prove you are right and everybody else is wrong. How could I miss that?

No one said he had a broken nose. And since when are surveillance tapes that clear to see what you claim. I could care less about you and you lying co-horts. You scream you are against the death penalty, yet you see no problem that the black panthers pit a contract out to kill George Zimmerman. You say equal rights to all but you (and Eric Holder) see no problem that the black panthers standing in front of a Philadelphia voting precinct with baseball bats threatening the white votes. Face it the most prejudge slim balls in the world are liberals. Walt

I'll take the Sanford Police Department's report that Zimmerman received injuries to his nose and the back of his head, over your analysis of grainy and low resolution surveillance footage. "And don't give me this bullsh*t about the eye witness reports because they prove nothing but the fact that someone wanted us to believe that George was harmed by Trayvon." Are you inferring that the Sanford PD fabricated eyewitness corroboration that Zimmerman was being assaulted by Martin in some conspiracy to exonerate Zimmerman of any wrongdoing? Jesus Christ, libtardation knows no bounds of irrational thought. GO: Refute me.

Your nose doesn't have to look broken to be broken. Honestly, get a clue.

You have no proof at all. All you have is what the MSM has shown you and that is not considered as evidence or proof of anything. I do not want to believe anyone until the true facts are on the table in a proper court of law, not, innuendo by Liberals on the Internet. An please grow up and stop using political slurs that have no meaning other than to show your lack of intelligence and your inability to properly convey information using the English language. @@Little Lukie BOY, You have no understanding of the law at all do you. Zimmerman does not have to prove anything, nor do I. it is the Prosecutions job to provide proof. so if you think your are the Prosecuter then start providing it and as a Juror, your Picture ain't worth the time of day. it is fuzzy and shows nothing. All this before the fact that you can't prove or disprove a Negative. If the Obama Boys down there had any Proof, George would be in custody behind bars. I don't like being called by your Juvenile names. My main point is Proved. Go back to school and learn just a little! Proud Vet (grownup)

You do realize that the average broken nose doesn't have to bleed. Also, it is not hard for a police officer to wipe up the blood to prevent it from getting all over his squad car. How about this, why don't we wait for the police to do what they need to do instead of listening to just one side of the problem. You also do realize that the police did their job once and was told that there is not enough evidence to prosecute.