Is India A Democracy Or A Congress Party Dictatorship?

Why Congress-I so called secular ?

• http://content.msn.co.in/MSNContribute/Story.aspx?PageID=81db6aca-18a8-440a-a78f-5034bd81a695 Instigating communal trouble to unsettle rivals in the party has been used by Congress-I(Not INC) leaders in the past with success. Maharashtra in1992 -1994 bewtween then and after Chief minister Sudhakar rao naik and Sharad Pawar. Andhra pradesh 1990 ( Chenna Reddy's government to remove him from power)&2010 Senior Congress-I legislator Shankar Rao has also alleged that those opposing Chief Minister Rosaiah were behind the riots to defame him and his government recently Hyderabad riots.The 1984 anti sikh riots all over India in the wake of Prime Minister Indira Gandhi's assassination.Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi, rather than condemning it, likened the carnage to the reverberations caused by the fall of a mighty tree betrays the illiberal character of India's democracy. That he did not permit Parliament to debate the whitewash done through an in camera inquiry conducted by a sitting Supreme Court judge, and that Parliament never even offered a condolence motion to the victims of the 1984 carnage expose the disdain for human rights displayed by the highest institutions in India (THOSE WHO WERE INVOLVED ALL ARE BEING PROMOTED AND ENJOYING THE POWER UPTO NOW ALSO) .Which set a dangerous precedent as an avowedly secular political party reaped an electoral harvest for engineering sectarian violence.This resulted in similar impunity and electoral rewards to the communal parties that organised the killings of Muslims in Congress-I ruled Maharashtra in 1993 and BJP ruled Gujarat in 2002.In an article in The Times of India (March 26) Madhu Purnima Kishwar noted how ?the 1970s and 1980s witnessed a series of communal riots presided over by the Congress Party in places like Meerut, Malliana, Jamshedpur, Kanpur, Bhiwandi, Bhagalpur, Ahmedabad and Hyderabad?. Are we supposed to forget Congress-led rioting because the party calls itself ?secular??. The numerous riots that resulted in thousands of deaths in States ruled by the Congress-I that occurred in Gujarat in which the death toll surpassed that of YEAR 2002.Conspiracy of the Congress-I and BJP for demolition BABRI MASJID 06/12/1992 and the handywork of both so called secular and the communal.In preparing the Liberhan Commission's final report. After 17 years and the Commission seems to have ended up supporting the Ramjanambhoomi case.In Chapter No. 2 (Ayodhya & Its Geography),Chapter 4(Sequence of Events).An agreement was signed between the then Home Minister Shri Buta Singh and VHP leader Shri Vinay Katiyar on 17AUG1988 what was that agreement ?. Next day the then Prime Minister Shri Rajiv Gandhi launched Congress Party’s election campaign from Faizabad, the town adjoining Ayodhya and declared ushering Ram Rajya as party’s goal. As in 1985 the congress government overruled the court 's decision in Shah bano case under pressure.For protest the then minister Arif Mohd Khan was forced to resign for the sudo secularism. Only months later the then Congress-I Prime minister Rajiv Gandhi restored the balance by giving orders for removing the locks and allowing the shilanyas ceremony in 1989 laying the foundation stone for mandir at the disputed place to appease hindus (" KAMALAPATI TRIPATI THE SENIOR LEADER OF THE CONGRESS-I ISSUED THE STATE MENT WARNING PM R.GANDHI THAT IF TEMPLE WILL BE BUILD IT WILL BE BUILD ON MY DEAD BODY" - HE WAS SECULAR).Until then a priest had been permited to perform puja once a year since 1949.The same for the sake of vote bank it was being hijacked by the BJP which raised from 2 Loksabha seats to 86 seats. In 1992 by keeping the eye ,ear closed on all intelligence report the Congress-I government indirectly supported the Babri masjid demolition by the Hindu fundamentalist and at that time no minister or the Prime minister resigned on moral grounds ( AS THE CONGRESS-I SENIOR LEADER'S ARJUN SINGH ,N D TIWARY AND OTHERS DIS OWENED THE PM-Mr.NARSIMAHA RAO AND RESIGNE AFTER 18 MONTHS BUT OUR PRESENT PM AND THE FINANCE MINISTER WAS ENJOYING TO BE IN POWER) During the Gujarat elections, Congress-I President Ms Gandhi played the ?soft Hindutva card?.During the Madhya Pradesh elections, Digvijay Singh ran all over the state to display his respect for ?holy cow?. Congress-I has been flaying BJP over Ram Mandir, but till date none of its leaders could come out in the open to oppose the proposed construction of Ram Mandir.What a secular Congress-I not bothering of the Kashmiri pandits, Tribals of the Assam and North Eastern states who are as a REFUGEE in their own country.Congress-I PM M.M.SINGH suggests the nation bury the Sikh massacre, Bagalpur riots and other genocides wrought by Congress-I, but keep BJP's communal past alive.Congress-I pits one community against the other only the to secure votes by playing the communal, casteism,reginolism & splitting the secular vote at the time of election & after election use secu

• Answer:

  It is self proclaimed by Congress but they are the one who divided the country on caste religion bases and missed any opportunity to implement divide and rule policy on the basis. They just play Secular card for Muslim voters. They are the worst in violating human rights killing thousand and thousand and yet they claim that they are secular whereas other prominent parties are not. The other main contribution of congress is creation of Regional Political Parties based on caste, religion etc.