Do you think it’s too expensive to drive to Sentosa with the cost of vehicle entry increased to S$7 and why?
-
Sentosa Development Corporation (SDC) has revised its pricing strategy for vehicles entering the island in an attempt to encourage more to use public transport. This is aimed at improving traffic conditions in view of the opening of Resorts World Sentosa later this month. Private vehicles entering Sentosa from January 18 will pay a charge, which varies according to the time and day. For example, it will cost S$6 to enter the island between 7am and just before noon on weekdays. On weekends and public holidays, it will cost S$7between 7am and 7pm. Currently, each private vehicle is charged S$2 and each passenger in the vehicle must pay an additional S$2 when entering Sentosa. Do you think it’s too expensive to drive to Sentosa with the cost of vehicle entry increased to S$7 and why?
-
Answer:
I think this is a good initiative by the SDC to ease potential traffic problems and to promote greener transport practices amongst visitors. Sentosa island is only so big, and should there be a sudden influx of visitors after the IR opens, parking and congestion on the internal roads will really be a very serious problem. There are only so many private cars that Sentosa can accomodate, unless we are prepared to see multi-storeyed carparks on Sentosa, or give up more recreation land on the island for parking. Even so, there is a limit to how many cars they can accomodate. This is even more important considering that only around a third of the island is open to the public. Moreover, with the current emphasis on going green, it is better to encourage visitors to take public or carpool. Our cars not yet environmentally friendly with the petrol they burn, and coaches and the monorail transport more passengers for the same amount of carbon footprint. Also, since we are entering the island to chill and relax, what better way is there than to leave the car behind, save the hassle of driving and parking, and take the various modes of transport available? Hence, here SDC and LTA are just thinking ahead and pre-empting the potential crowds that Sentosa will draw. However, I qualify my opinion. While the intention is good, the execution is far from perfect. A look at the attached document on Sentosa's website indicates that it actually costs CHEAPER to drive into Sentosa. This is because the flat rate charged to cars covers all passengers in the car. Hence, compared to the current rate, unless there are 2 or less visitors in a car (1 driver and 1 passenger), it is actually cheaper to drive in. Such a measure will hardly serve to control the number of cars on the island. Visitors usually enter in groups, and seldom singly or in twos, and hence the revision hardly discourages them to drive (though the parking fees are a different matter). Furthermore, for those who can well afford a car, a flat fee of $7 per entry is seriously too cheap for a 'world-class' venue like Sentosa (as advertised). If SDC is serious about prohibiting cars on the island, they can consider charging cars $50 per entry instead. $7 doesn't even bring in enough revenue, so that argument does not stand. Also, the measure of relying mainly on prohibitive charges is not one that goes down well. Perhaps SDC can come up with more incentives to use public transport and actively publicise them instead of highlighting the negative aspects. Also, it can actively address the concerns of certain drivers, e.g. those with very young children or the very elderly, so they (the drivers) can enjoy the island as well. The above being said, it must be said that overall Sentosa is a very expensive island and every little thing costs there. It seems more oriented to attract foreign tourists rather than the home crowd. In their efforts to attract tourist dollars to boost the Singapore economy it seems the powers that be have ostracised local Singaporeans, placing Sentosa out of reach, unless the locals possess the same purchasing power as foreign visitors and are likewise willing to pay. In addition, the 'attractions' on the island are not really attractive. It used to be so much better about 10 years ago when there were fewer man-made 'attractions' and better beaches. Everything on the island have become so commercialised now. I have only been on the island twice in the past 5 years, only to patronise the restaurants. Each time, I was there for less than 4 hours. Hence I agree with S E Ho: So Expensive Nothing TO See Also And so, that being the case, I would say that the changes, while good, would have no real effect on most Singaporeans, because there is very little real incentive to visit Sentosa in the first place! =)
Yahoo! editor at Yahoo! Answers Visit the source
Other answers
Sentosa Development Corporation (SDC) implied that the entry price increase is an attempt to encourage more to use public transport. But if one has more than 3 pax in the car, it would be cheapwer to driver to drive to enter Sentosa, compared to the existing rates of $2 per pax / car. Most people enter Sentosa in a group, and/or with the entire family. A check at the check point will confirm this. This move seems to encourage people to drive in to Sentosa, and thereafter to milk the cash cow, by increasing parking rates too. On paper, it looks like a move to manage traffic in Sentosa, but in actual fact, this move is a disguised attempt by Sentosa to increase revenue. Sentosa has lost its magic. Gone are the days where the roads in Sentosa is uncongested when people are not allowed to drive into Sentosa. SENTOSA truely lives up to its name of : So Expensive Nothing TO See Also
S E Ho
this type of decision will only lead me to another decision: i will not enter Sentosa unles there is really a need to do so. If iam invited, i will go only if the host pay this for me. as for myself, i will not host any event at such a 'high class' and 'expensive' place. alternatively, i would expect the public to be superb ie. train or bus service come every 2 minutes to ferry passenger. And parking at train station or surrounding aread need to be convenient, accessible without caught in rain or too much sunshine to gett o train. and parking rate has to be reasonably cheap. Sound demanding right? Why should't the patrons demand if the operators demands such charges on customers. Unless they have super good business.
father of 3
Gone are the days when you can get some free stuffs in Sentosa, such as the Musical Fountain. Nowadays, you just pay and pay the minute you step inside. Very very expensive, nothing much to see. You easily spend up to $100 each time u visit the place run by very mercenary organisation. Actually, it feels like Singapore as a whole is becoming like Sentosa.
Kafka
Definetly it cost too too much $ 2 is a reasonable price should not increase.
SL L
That's too much & ridiculous.Sentosa is for Singaporeans to enjoy for any kind of recreational activities our fellow men wish to spend time with,why the exorbitant charges?Whose benefit is this?
Dzalflyer
Yes, its too expensive. When you get into Sentosa, there are other entrance fees and car park charges as well
J T
Everything in Sentosa is already so expensive and inconvenient. Now with the price increase of more than 50% for vehicle entry is absolutely too expensive. People or locals will still visit Sentosa BUT i guess will be like only once a year or even none after the increment. Taking public transport is good but if you were to travel with old folks and children, it is so much of a hassle and inconvenience thus the need to drive. There are better choices out there than to travel to Sentosa.Eg: A drive in to JB or even to Malacca (3hrs or so) and enjoy a better sightseeing, zoo, seaside, picnic, food, shopping etc.
missy
Jojo, In Vegas, they still have cheap hotel rooms from as low as US$20 per night and cheap US$5 beef steak set meals, US$10 mega buffets (eat till you drop kind, with a gastronomic spread) to entice visitors. Are there any thing close that Sentosa has to offer?
clarence yeoh
I don't see this move as encouraging more to use public transport. On the contrary, I see it's a way that SDC has thought of to bring in more $ for itself. With the pricing revision, a car with 3 people will need to pay $6/$7 instead of the current $8. Hence, more people will start to drive for the cheaper rate and convenience. When the traffic condition gets worse in Sentosa, SDC will then announce that there is a need to further increase its pricing to ease the traffic situation (Just see how our ERP works. Instead of limiting the number of cars per household like the way the HDB allocation works, the smart authority comes out with the ERP idea!). The end result? The rich will continue to drive whereas, the poor and/or the handicapped will have to be deprived from driving/going to Sentosa.
Elsie
Related Q & A:
- Can I transfer my MP3's from a flash drive to my PS3?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
- What's a good hard-drive Camcorder?Best solution by camcorders.toptenreviews.com
- How much would a used xbox 360 without the plug's and hard drive cost?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
- Which is more expensive: hard drive camcorder or flash memory camcorder?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
- How does Brazil celebrate Christmas, what do they do when it's Christmas, and why do they do it?Best solution by ask.com
Just Added Q & A:
- How many active mobile subscribers are there in China?Best solution by Quora
- How to find the right vacation?Best solution by bookit.com
- How To Make Your Own Primer?Best solution by thekrazycouponlady.com
- How do you get the domain & range?Best solution by ChaCha
- How do you open pop up blockers?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
For every problem there is a solution! Proved by Solucija.
-
Got an issue and looking for advice?
-
Ask Solucija to search every corner of the Web for help.
-
Get workable solutions and helpful tips in a moment.
Just ask Solucija about an issue you face and immediately get a list of ready solutions, answers and tips from other Internet users. We always provide the most suitable and complete answer to your question at the top, along with a few good alternatives below.