Which area in Los Angeles is better?

Which California region costs more to live in for middle class? Bay Area or Los Angeles County?

• I don't plan on moving to either SF Bay Area or LA County for a while, not until at least I have a plan. But I was wondering for those live in either areas, which area costs more to live in? I understand that both San Francisco and Los Angeles have rich and poor areas around them. East Oakland is bad and many cities east of the 405 are bad. And I know if you want to live in Marin County or Pacific Palisades, you'll need a lot of money! Let's say you're working a decent job making 50-60K a year. In general, will it cost more to live in the San Francisco Bay Area, or Los Angeles County? From an outsider's perspective, I would think that Los Angeles would cost more. Simply because a car is an almost-necessity in the area, the cost of having one will increase the cost of living. But I could be wrong.

• Answer:

  When you factor in a car and gas because you are always stuck on some freeway in LA, I would say LA is higher. There is another factor to consider. That is time. In LA you are going to spend a lot more time commuting (unless you happen to luck out and live near your job). How much is several hours a day worth to you? Considering that factor I believe San Francisco is a lot more attractive.