Is Reader's Digest Magazine worth the money?
-
Each issue of Reader’s Digest comes with a lot of information that may be useful for the readers in general. However, no one can deny the fact that the magazine also comes these days with a lot more advertisements! Compared with the amount of useful information that we may get from reading the magazine, the amount of annoying number of pages of advertisement is overwhelming. More than two-thirds of the entire content from wrapper to wrapper is just ads! Would it be a good idea to ask the magazine to be circulated for free?
-
Answer:
In its old format it was an excellant publication. Today I buy issues of the 1940s and 1950s atused book sales at the local library. They are still good articles and are better than today's tripe.
Emerald at Yahoo! Answers Visit the source
Other answers
I had not read it for years. Thanks for telling me that if not I would have bought it!
Lucky♣Girl
Then they wouldn't make as much mioney. Where's your sense of greed?
mel
I have had a subscription to it, won't again, it's too boring and now a waste of money.....YAWN
zeekandthefam
No. It is bland and colorless. You are right, most of the magazine is advertising. It is a waste of time and money. The condensed books are great however, I read War and Peace in 10 minutes.
gyorzxk
no its not worth the money because most information/stories can be found on the internet if you know where to look
DodgerBlueFan
my grandmother reads it, that should answer your question
apage123
I would rather spend my $$$ on Cosmo: same format, useful information (although many of the "articles" are really also thinly veiled ads) and it makes me feel young and hip just picking it up at the grocery store, whereas RD makes me feel instantly like an old fogey.
shycello
Have you really looked at any other magazine.. They are all ads. Prob 90% ads and 10% articles. I know its frustrating but without em the mag would cost 10x as much. Readers Digest at least as good quality articles and prob the ratio is somewhere between 30% ads and 70% articles. A magazine circulated for free couldn't be done as they would go under with no funds to print and pay the contributors.
are u crazy?...cuz i am not!
It used to be worth its weight in gold up till the end of the past century when it started concentrating on diet, saving money and unessential moralizing. Ads are the lifeblood of publications, no doubt, and there's no such thing as a free lunch !!!
mandrake
Related Q & A:
- What's the lowest amount of money you have to make to be considered rich?Best solution by financialsamurai.com
- Looking for a LCD tv worth the money?
- Is Amazon Kindle worth the money?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
- Is cooking school worth the money?Best solution by allculinaryschools.com
- Is there a men's Vogue magazine?Best solution by en.wikipedia.org
Just Added Q & A:
- How many active mobile subscribers are there in China?Best solution by Quora
- How to find the right vacation?Best solution by bookit.com
- How To Make Your Own Primer?Best solution by thekrazycouponlady.com
- How do you get the domain & range?Best solution by ChaCha
- How do you open pop up blockers?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
For every problem there is a solution! Proved by Solucija.
-
Got an issue and looking for advice?
-
Ask Solucija to search every corner of the Web for help.
-
Get workable solutions and helpful tips in a moment.
Just ask Solucija about an issue you face and immediately get a list of ready solutions, answers and tips from other Internet users. We always provide the most suitable and complete answer to your question at the top, along with a few good alternatives below.