What is the sensory stimulus?

If the stimulus didn't create the promised jobs, what will?

  • Before you write that the stimulus wasn't enough, just look at the list of packages from March 2008 to June 2009: March 2008: Bush stimulus $29 billion for Bear Stearns/JP Morgan Chase deal May 2008: Bush stimulus $178 billion in tax rebate checks July 2008: Bush stimulus $300 billion for distressed homeowners July 2008: Bush stimulus $200 billion for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac September 2008: Bush stimulus $50 billion to guarantee money market funds September 2008: Bush stimulus $25 billion to Big 3 automakers September-November 2008: Bush stimulus $150 billion to AIG October 2008: Bush stimulus $700 billion to banks (TARP) February 2009: Obama stimulus $787 billion in broad stimulus package February 2009: Obama stimulus $75 billion for distressed homeowners February 2009: Obama stimulus $200 billion for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac March 2009: Obama stimulus $30 billion for AIG March 2009: Obama stimulus $15 billion for Small Business lending March 2009: Obama stimulus $1 trillion for banks to remove "toxic assets" from their books March 2009: Obama stimulus $22 billion for Big 3 automakers Chrysler and GM April 2009: Global stimulus $1 trillion commitment from G-20 countries June 2009: Obama stimulus $30 billion to help General Motors file bankruptcy While some of this may not have actually been spent, a large percentage of it was. By any reasonable and historical count the various packages have been, in total, beyond huge. To say we need more to stimulate real job growth seems crazy to me. What say you? Try to avoid name calling in your answer.

  • Answer:

    I'd say Robert Higgs research on "Regime Uncertainty" and it's role in the current "jobless recovery" is closer to correct than "the stimulus wasn't enough" argument". Excess reserves grew by over 1500% in the last three years, while real consumer spending is above pre-recession levels. If "Keynes was right" as Krugman claims, we'd see unemployment around 6-7%.

'Abdul Masiih at Yahoo! Answers Visit the source

Was this solution helpful to you?

Other answers

keep up the good work. rebuplicans pushing for tax cuts on corporations and the rich is insane and wrong. not that demorats are any better. the two-party system is deceptive and designed to divide and the appease the masses which it does. this is the way our country and economy works. they give money to the rich and it 'trickles down' from the 'haves' to the 'have nots,' those that serve and those that get served. how else would a services economy operate? as for really answering your question...i presume most will propose solutions that benefit themselves. their solutions will be heard and implemented and I will have to suffer and slave in a fake meat factory. I do have a solution that benefits myself and would lead to a good and happy life for myself, but that would result in reduced poverty and less slave labor, cant have that. I dream of one day having a farm, with a windmill and a greenhouse, but that is not likely to occur on this Earth with this amount of psychic illness

not I said the ape

Find solution

For every problem there is a solution! Proved by Solucija.

  • Got an issue and looking for advice?

  • Ask Solucija to search every corner of the Web for help.

  • Get workable solutions and helpful tips in a moment.

Just ask Solucija about an issue you face and immediately get a list of ready solutions, answers and tips from other Internet users. We always provide the most suitable and complete answer to your question at the top, along with a few good alternatives below.