Can someone explain the finacial crisis?

Can someone please explain in lay terms the current financial crisis?

  • What is the current financial/economic crisis about? How did it start? What happened with Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae, Lehmann Brothers, Merrill Lynch, and AIG? Why is it such an emergency to "fix" it? How will the government bailout help, and why is the bailout so controversial? Whose fault is all this? Are we really on the brink of financial collapse, and if so, what does that actually mean? I'm not an unintelligent person, I just do not understand economics, and if anyone could explain it simply, I would so appreciate it!

  • Answer:

    The government, wall st., and everyday average citizens wanted more people to buy and own houses. Instead of traditional loan procedures like good credit, jobs, income level, collateral, and 10-20 percent downpayments, ALL of the above mentioned people thought it would be a good idea to sell loans to people with a good interest rate and low downpayment, when these people couldn't afford it, had bad credit or no credit, little to no collateral, and maybe even no job. These people, obviously, began to default on these loans because as you can imagine, they could not afford it in the first place. Now, again, the blame lies EVERYWHERE. From Wall St. to the Clinton presidency to the Bush presidency to everyday people like you and me. Everyone thought, for some reason that this would, in the end, be a good plan to increase home sales and ownership. These loans were then used to back or leverage other deals and transactions, thinking that the interest/payments paid on these loans would more than pay for any other transactions made. These transactions were "mortgage backed" transactions. When people started missing their payments, all of the sudden these "mortgage backed" transactions were not funded any longer. This drove the value of these mortgages as investment tools down to almost nothing. No one would buy them, no one would sell them- which equals death in the market. They became what people call "toxic" or unable to move at all either buying or selling, they are worthless. These investment houses and banks owned so much of these mortgage backed expenses that it absolutely overwhelmed them. It would be like if you owned a business that sold furniture. All of the suddent the furniture was worthless, but you still owed your creditors, the utilities, the rent on your store, and could not pay them because your inventory was worthless. You would go out of business. That is a weak example, because it doesn't take so many things into consideration, but you get the idea. However, there are real houses out there that are certainly "worth" something, AS LONG AS THERE ARE PEOPLE IN THEM MAKING PAYMENTS ON THEIR MORTGAGES.. That is the government's "bail out" plan. To infuse enough money back into these "toxic" assets in order to get them trading again, and to get people back in them that will pay their mortgages fully and on time. Then, in the near future, these assets will no longer be "toxic" because this money infusion goal is to get people back in them paying their mortgages, which in turn will hopefully make them EXTREMELY valuable, and maybe even make the government 7-10% in gains over the next few years. All of this also leans into the credit market, especially the overnight lending which usually occurs between banks to keep loans/etc. a float. This has virtually stopped. I heard yesterday that if you want a car loan, unless you have at least a 720 credit score, you will 100% not get one. Loans for businesses & banks to stay active, trading and working is crucial. So this is the "credit crisis". Banks are hoarding cash and not lending it to ANYONE without the most pristine credit. So this adds to the already terrible problem. So much more but I have not the time to explain it all. SO, the big question is, will all of this work? Let's all hope so because there are seemingly no other options on the table. Whether you agree with Democrats or Republicans, it doesn't really matter in this case. We will ALL come down if this doesn't work. Oversight, Oversight Oversight on the money is needed. Brilliant people need to be in charge, and like I said, politics must take a back seat. Paulson, by all accounts, and from EVERYONE I know and have heard, is a brilliant man. Whether this power corrupts him is yet to be seen but I am sure he has the best intentions.

Genius at Yahoo! Answers Visit the source

Was this solution helpful to you?

Other answers

David's answer is well balanced and true. He did leave one issue out. That is the speculation in the real estate market. People were buying, flipping homes for short term gains, it was just a matter when supply would outstrip true demand. This is no different than the stock market bubble of the late 1990's. While the party is going, no one looks in the closet, but when the music stops. They look in the closet for skeletons and the blame game starts.

Max Power

It started several years ago and is a combination of the US government borrowing too much money and a regulatory change that had an unintended consequence. The United States has been borrowing incredible sums, a billion dollars a day from the government of China just to keep the lights on here. You cannot have a war and not raise taxes. So huge amounts of debt were being bought by other countries, flooding countries with dollars. The second part was a regulatory change. Bonds are less risky than loans so the capital requirements for bonds was reduced. Banks immediately started packaging loans as bonds when the rule changed in 2005. Now these risky loans were "less risky" because you changed their classification from a loan to a bond. That of course is ridiculous. However, the rule change made it impossible for banks to make an economic profit unless they made a boatload of loans and repackage them. Competition drove out profits unless they expanded substantially. Once they ran out of good borrowers they found bad borrowers because the worst loans were being sold to the public and not kept. They got a fee for every loan regardless of how good or bad it was. On August 17th, 2007 foreigners who had loaned money to the West started making withdrawals. It started in Germany with German banks unable to fund their deposits so they started selling American mortgages. The price of mortgages quickly went from $100 per $100 to $0 per $100 and the mortgage market collapsed the next day in the United States. Next, in the US banks stopped loaning money to each other at any price. At one point American banks stopped accepting US Treasury obligations because it considered them too risky. About two months ago the US had to request to have its credit ratings reviewed because lenders were considering downgrading US debt from AAA. Americans forget US Treasury obligations do carry risk, they are just considered close to riskless. Then bank runs started in the United Kingdom. There has been a systematic daily withdrawal from the entire US and European banking systems for over a year now. Think of it as a very quiet run on every bank in the US and Europe. Freddie and Fannie were a bad solution to a worse problem. Because they had become so powerful they were not allowed to go out of business until they failed. The failure is directly Congresses fault. IndyMac suffered a run and failed. Bear Sterns suffered a run and failed. Both would have survived in normal circumstances. Lehmann had a run and failed but it did not really see its own problems, it was in denial. Merrill Lynch had a gold balance sheet and faced a run so merged. AIG had a AAA rating and faced a run and was rescued. Right now these mortgage assets place banks at risk of mass failure. The last time this happened, the Great Depression, a 3% downward shift brought almost immediate 24% unemployment and a 75% reduction in machinary, equipment, building, land and capital goods sales. If this bill is not passed, plan on seeing one in four Americans fired. Plan on finally fixing the problem in ten years or maybe fifteen. We are beyond the understanding in economics of what will happen because we have only had a few such events and we were not this big or complex. During the Jackson Administration when this happened loans for money for just one day hit 24% and that was if you had perfect credit and tons of money and assets to seize if you didn't pay it back.

OPM

Related Q & A:

Just Added Q & A:

Find solution

For every problem there is a solution! Proved by Solucija.

  • Got an issue and looking for advice?

  • Ask Solucija to search every corner of the Web for help.

  • Get workable solutions and helpful tips in a moment.

Just ask Solucija about an issue you face and immediately get a list of ready solutions, answers and tips from other Internet users. We always provide the most suitable and complete answer to your question at the top, along with a few good alternatives below.