If you were hired by Time Magazine to produce a drawing of what a newly discovered species might have looked?
-
like, of what a newly discovered species might have looked like, what features would you be confident in reproducing and what features would be speculation? Does our inability to know everything from the fossil record limit our ability to understand previous species? Does it limit our understanding of evolution?
-
Answer:
That would depend entirely on how much they have found of that species. A few bones, a whole skeleton, several complete skeletons, fossil imprints and so on. The less facts there are the more uncertain the image will be. So: ["What features would you be confident in reproducing and what features would be speculation?"] I would feel confident in reproducing anything that there is enough scientific evidence of. Anything that isn't based on the science would then be speculation and I would make it clear that it was speculation and nothing else. ["Does our inability to know everything from the fossil record limit our ability to understand previous species?"] Of course. It's uncertain even if we add all other knowledge that we have of the time and environment they lived in. We can at best claim to have a basic understanding and never full knowledge. ["Does it limit our understanding of evolution?"] This question is a bit sketchy. Do we understand what evolution is? Of course we do if the take the time to learn about the concept. It's nothing strange about it and can easily be explained as well as proven. Evolution is in a very basic form "progress, change and growth over time". Our limited understanding of fossils or newly found species does not change that basic fact. Does it limit our understanding of what exactly has happened through the millions of years of evolution this world has gone through? Of course it does. We can only make theories about the nature of the exact events based on what we know. There are huge gaps of information missing, things we have not found yet and things that we might never find. This is also one of the corner stones of science, we base our theories on what facts we have and admit that we don't know it all. When new facts surface we have to revise the theory and start all over again. That's how science works. "Question, find facts, form a theory, question, find new facts, revise theory ... start all over again." Your work does not end because you think you know the truth.
Todd at Yahoo! Answers Visit the source
Related Q & A:
- What is a good name for a youth magazine?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
- Marketing Ideas for a newly licensed Insurance Agent?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
- What's a good name for a science magazine?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
- What time do shops on Oxford St close on a Sunday?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
- What is a good name for a rock music magazine?Best solution by funadvice.com
Just Added Q & A:
- How many active mobile subscribers are there in China?Best solution by Quora
- How to find the right vacation?Best solution by bookit.com
- How To Make Your Own Primer?Best solution by thekrazycouponlady.com
- How do you get the domain & range?Best solution by ChaCha
- How do you open pop up blockers?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
For every problem there is a solution! Proved by Solucija.
-
Got an issue and looking for advice?
-
Ask Solucija to search every corner of the Web for help.
-
Get workable solutions and helpful tips in a moment.
Just ask Solucija about an issue you face and immediately get a list of ready solutions, answers and tips from other Internet users. We always provide the most suitable and complete answer to your question at the top, along with a few good alternatives below.