I have questions on the "Out of Africa Human Migration Model." Can anyone help?
-
- I am familiar with the general idea asserted with the "Out of Africa Human Migration Model/Theory." It certainly is not infinitely complicated, but to paraphrase the major concept in extraordinarily simple terms for the purpose of my own education, I say that,... My understanding of the theory is essentially that the oldest human remains are found in East Africa, human beings first appeared in THAT area, and basically some of them migrated out of that region in several waves over a long period of time, and eventually populated Asia, Europe, Australia, and the America's. The theory sounds pretty solid to me, but what I do NOT understand, and what I have NOT been able to find out is,... 1. Where did the first migration/migrations go first? Meaning what general area did they settle first? Did the first migration/migrations settle in Asia, The Middle East, Oceania, Europe,....Where??? 2. Obviously, the Black racial phenotype was the first to appear on Earth. Which was second, third, and so on,... How did the original phenotype mutate into today's Caucasoid, Mongoloid, and Australoid populations. Which phenotype was the first successor to the original African phenotype,... which was next, and so on,... and approximately when did these other phenotypes appear, and in what order??? If anyone knows,... I would GREATLY APPRECIATE any valid information on the subject, and if nothing else would anyone at least know where/how I could go about finding these answers? Does anyone have them? Any real help would be greatly appreciated,... THANK YOU!!!
-
Answer:
1. It does get a bit complicated when you use the term human. That could apply to all the hominids that are presumed to have left Africa since about 2 million years ago. I assume from the context, you are talking about modern humans so I will restrict it to that. The oldest non African modern humans were found in a site in Israel and were about 100.000 years old. Neanderthals were found near there and were much more recent so it is assumed that Neanderthals probably displaced them. The next migration is thought to have happened about 60,000 years ago but the dates are supported by genetic data because there are very few fossils of that age for modern humans outside of Africa. There are two assumed paths. One is through Israel and the other is across the Red Sea and across Arabia. Then they apparently occupied Asia. There is evidence of them reaching Australia about 50,000 years ago. It is assumed they started occupying Europe between 30,000 and 40000 years but the oldest solid evidence is about 30,000 years ago. Apparently it took them that long to adapt to the climate and ecosystems to outcompete the Neanderthals. 2. Black racial phenotype is not a precise way to state that so I am not sure what you mean exactly. Evolution didn't stop for Africans and they weren't the same as they are today. They were logically dark skinned but that is only a few genes. The rest of the genes would have continued to evolve like they did for the groups that left. It is thought that all the people who left Africa came from a small group of perhaps only a few hundred people. The current races or populations with regional differences gradually evolved. It would be arbitrary to say when any of them evolved and it would make more sense that they gradually diverged from the original population that left Africa..
Race-sci... at Yahoo! Answers Visit the source
Other answers
The out of "Africa" route was between the Red Sea and the Mediterranean. It is possible that humans cross the Red Sea though there's not a lot of physical evidence for it.Evidence from Israel shows that there were several waves and retreats of humans. This is related to the various colder periods of the last ice age. Skin color, by which most classify race is directly related to the sun. In higher latitudes, lighter skin better absorbs the weaker sunlight and allows production of vitamin D. Darker skin, closure to the equator provides protection for the more direct sun. Witness the skin cancer rates of Australians, a primarily European population that moved to the tropics. Asians, it's been suggested, were a light skinned population that moved back to the tropics. As for the "Mitochondrial Eve" stuff, this has been greatly twisted by some to fit their own agendas. You can trace a female line using mitochondrial DNA. However the line "end" when the woman has no children or dies early. Start with a number of women, wait a few centuries and several of the 'lines" will have ended. The "Mitochondrial Eve" theory is a mathematical proof of this. That we are all related to a women living in the past. What it DOESN'T state is that there were no other women alive at the time or that all the other women didn't have children. Neither does it set a date for when (or if) the other female lines died out. Supposedly another theory has traced the male lineage back to an "Adam" However the dates the two supposedly "lived" are tens of thousands of years apart.
icabod
As far as I know, the earliest fossil hominids found outside Africa are the 1.8 million year old specimins of Homo georgicus found at Dmanisi in Georgia (the country, not the state). Whether these represent the earliest human migration, or just the earliest evidence found thus far, is open to question. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homo_georgicus
username_hidden
It is actually known that all of the human race alive today came from one female "mitochondrial eve" that most likely came from the mid east area.
Michael A
here are some articles from national geographic that can explain it a lot better than I can. It's a bit of reading, but you seem reasonably intelligent and might enjoy them.
googleplex
1. http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/41026000/gif/_41026369_genographic_map416.gif 2. I would think the order goes like this: Mongoloid, Caucasoid, and Australoid. I imagine that lighter features would have taken longer to be evolved (through natural selection) than Mongoloid features (such as epicanthic fold). It would have taken longer for the Australoids for them to move all the way through south and southeast Asia to migrate to Australia. Hope I helped.
MB
Related Q & A:
- Can anyone help me do a website?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
- Can anyone help me get directions to Commonwelath park in beaverton oregon?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
- Can anyone help me fix my MSN Keyboard Trouble?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
- Can anyone help me with Windows Automatic Updates?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
- Can anyone help with the Myspace graphic?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
Just Added Q & A:
- How many active mobile subscribers are there in China?Best solution by Quora
- How to find the right vacation?Best solution by bookit.com
- How To Make Your Own Primer?Best solution by thekrazycouponlady.com
- How do you get the domain & range?Best solution by ChaCha
- How do you open pop up blockers?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
For every problem there is a solution! Proved by Solucija.
-
Got an issue and looking for advice?
-
Ask Solucija to search every corner of the Web for help.
-
Get workable solutions and helpful tips in a moment.
Just ask Solucija about an issue you face and immediately get a list of ready solutions, answers and tips from other Internet users. We always provide the most suitable and complete answer to your question at the top, along with a few good alternatives below.