Who is better Albert Pujols or barry Bonds?

WITH OR WITHOUT ROIDS (NO ONE HAS PROVED HE ACTUALLY DID) 700 PLUS HOMERS IS AMAZING PUJOLS WILL NEVER REACH AS MANY AS BONDS SO I SAY BARRY BONDS

Way too early in Pujols career for a fair comparison. However, if you compare the them based strictly on the first few years only, Pujols is way ahead. Way ahead. But at the same time, Albert isn't a lock HOF'er yet. Long way to go for that. And don't get me wrong, because I don't really like Barry (born & raised in Pittsburgh PA), but he's a HOF'er if the Writer's vote based on his numbers and not his personality.

barry bonds becouse he's gotten better as he's gotten older.

Bonds is a cheat therefore he can not be compared to a real player. BTW, Bonds will not go to the hall of fame, Rose didn't and Bonds did much worse, He F'ed with the record books.

BONDS SUCKS!!!!!!!!!!!! by far it has to be Pujols. Pujols if he stays nonhurt and stays hot. Will hit at least 700 homers in his career.

Hands down Pujols...

Albert Pujols he can probably pass Barry Bonds even without steroids.

Pujols now. In his prime Bonds is the best player in history.

Pujols because bonds did use steroids whether you want to deny it or not, Pujols plays clean and fair, he plays on true talent and skill, bonds uses steroids and thinks he can get away with it.