Can anybody tell me what is the difference between rich man and poor man? Think differently please.?

it's a series of behaviours and concepts. Simply put... a rich man is willing to do what a poor one will not.

a rich man has all that he wants whether it be knowledge satisfaction with life family not necessarily money a poor man is down and out he may have money but has no friends

poor tension free sleep rich insomania

It's kinda the same as the begger man and the thief. The begger man is the poor man and the thief is the rich man. The difference is, the fact that the rich doctor and lawyer don't have the pride of the Indian Chief.

A rich man spends his time thinking about ways to make and keep money. A poor man thinks of having fun, if he can afford it.

A rich man has a lot of money and gets what he wants.And a poor man has little or no money.

Rich man, poor man The Hindu ART BUCHWALD December 8, 2003 Do Republicans care less about the poor than other people? It probably would never have come up if they hadn't tried to cut children out of the tax credit program. Republican House leader Tom Delay, who is known in Washington as "the Exterminator" (his actual profession in Texas), has been quoted as saying, "There are a lot of things more important than (tax credit for children). To me it's difficult to give tax relief to people that don't pay income tax". I called a friend, Rudolph the Red Nose Republican, and told him, "Delay shot himself in the foot. He said there are more important things than tax breaks for poor children". "He doesn't dislike poor children", Rudolph said. "He just likes people in the middle and upper classes more". I said, "The working poor were taken out of the original tax cut legislation and there was such an uproar that the Senate put it back by a vote of 94 to 2. The House finally agreed to pass something as long as the other classes got their first. What is the difference between the working poor and the working rich?" He said, "The working rich have accountants and lawyers, while the working poor can't even afford H&R Block. The rich can find tax shelters in the Cayman Islands or Bermuda. The IRS has a tough time finding where the dummy corporations' money went. It is much easier for the IRS to track down the working poor because they spend all their money on food. "Isn't it true some of the rich pay no taxes at all?" "Some of them don't, but they give to the American Red Cross". I said, "I heard from a Democratic friend that the President insists on tax cuts for the rich because they are the big spenders". Rudolph said, "The President will do anything to jumpstart the economy. Besides, some of his best friends are rich". You can say that again. They appreciate the good things in life, but don't the working poor appreciate the good things too?" "Possibly", replied Red Nose, "but Republicans don't know any poor people except the ones working for them. I think Delay is getting a bad rap. He just worries about balancing the budget or the political fund-raising. It is not only the Republicans who have problems with the working poor - a lot of Democrats do too. I wouldn't be surprised if they put the tax cut back into the bill because they are worried about the 2004 election". "Why are the Republican House members so intent in their bill to make the poor wait a year to get their full tax cut?" "What's the hurry?" he answered. "Look, we are for the poor getting what they have coming to them. Our message is, if you vote Republican, then someday you'll be rich and be able to give money to the party of Lincoln, Teddy Roosevelt and George Bush the Second". I told Rudolph the Red Nose Republican, "I'm glad you straightened me out. If the economy keeps slipping, the working poor will become the majority". --------------------------------------… Poor Rupert Murdoch The Hindu ART BUCHWALD December 29, 2003 POOR Rupert Murdoch. He owns newspapers, TV and cable networks, movie studios and magazines. He can hire the best lawyers in the world. He is a billionaire - yet he can't even win a lawsuit against Al Franken, the satirist (a.k.a. Flaming Liberal). Franken is coming out with a new book titled, "Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them," subtitled, "A Fair and Balanced Look at the Right." The cover has a photo of Bill O'Reilly (the star Fox anchorman), President Bush and Vice-President Cheney.. Murdoch had his day in court and it was a bad one. Fox maintained that the words, "A Fair and Balanced Look" are owned by them and no one else can use them. The Fox people asked for an injunction to keep the book from being distributed with the title. The Judge, Denny Chin, had to decide if "A Fair and Balanced Look" was owned by Murdoch, Al Franken, or the entire English-speaking world. He also had to decide whether putting Bill O'Reilly's photo on the cover would mean that he was endorsing the book. Murdoch's lawyers said it was a deadly serious cover and Franken was using Fox to sell his book. The judge looked at all the evidence and then declared that Fox's case was "Wholly without merit, both factually and legally." Legal experts said this was the first time anyone found a Murdoch-filed lawsuit without merit. Mr.Franken's lawyer said the decision was a great victory for the First Amendment. I wasn't called as a character witness. If I had been, I would be on Mr.Murdoch's side. I am a diehard conservative, far to the right of Robert Novak. I have two subscriptions to the National Review, one in the office and one at home. I read every book on the New York Times bestseller list that attacks liberals - who are worse than traitors and terrorists. I send money to Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson and all the right-wing causes. I subscribe to Murdoch's New York Post, which I consider my paper of record. I would have made a telling witness for Fox because of my knowledge of the English language. Having said all this, I think Al Franken is a troublemaker. He makes fun of the things that Americans hold dear - and he wants to make money doing it. I have another reason to suspect that Franken is a liberal. It's that he uses satire to put over one of his extreme left-wing ideas. As Fox so aptly pointed out, most people don't understand satire or that when Franken puts Bill O'Reilly on his book cover, he is not calling him a liar but just joshing with him. The same goes for Bush and Cheney. The First Amendment protects satire, but as the Fox lawyer maintained brilliantly, Franken's title was ambiguous because it did not say "parody" or "satire" on the cover. How is anybody going to know? I, of course, believe in satire. I put it in the same class as pornography. If I ever want a picture of Bill O'Reilly on the cover of one of my books, I will never use the words "fair and balanced." Those words belong to Rupert Murdoch and I'm not going to upset him. The reason is he owns a ton of newspapers and Franken doesn't own any. If I am going to sell my column to the Murdoch newspapers, I want him to know that I am on his side.

A rich man is one with high moral fiber. A poor man is one not respected. -MM

the poor man shares what little he has therefor preventing him from being rich in a worldly sense where as the the rich man saves and collects everything he has there for having worldly wealth . so who is rich and who is poor i will let you make the choice