What do u think can make a search engine better than the existing ones like yahoo,google?
-
-
Answer:
First of all, you seem to be pretty serious about the project. Given my opinion, if you want to beat Yahoo, Google, you simply need to make a search engine with artificial intelligence, i.e. you start asking questions to it and it replies to you correspondingly. "How can I learn Taekwandoo?" and gives in replies all the sites which have a sort of introduction / FAQ , etc in a manner as a human is replying. I can agree, we need to fast forward ourselves in the future by about 25- 30 years to make that happen. You can agree that there is no deal for you to make a new search engine, if it dosen't offer anything new beside Google and Yahoo. Google is my favourite search engine, but still its not the absolute for all searches. At the bottom part of my answer, I have done some analysis of Google in todays date. Lastly as a suggestion to one of my previous question, I was informed to go about Blog search. Traditional search engines simply crawl the network to find pages to add to their listing, but this approach does not work in a blogging environment, where you may have 100,000 pages updated in less than a day. The question is, how do you arrange your search network to accept pings from pages when they are updated as well as simply crawling? This is the problem that Technorati and Icerocket, among others, are working on. http://www.technorati.com/ http://www.icerocket.com/ ANALYSIS OF GOOGLE Pros of Google: As a seach engine, google has the best relevance and presents the results in a way that I find easy to decide what pages are best for me. Its the best in terms of researching information. For makin money, a #1 on google is worth many times more than a #1 on yahoo. Yahoo! blocks the top of the SERPs with sponsored ads. Google also has a neat interface. Yahoo is not bad too, but its interface is not that neat. The reason for that being it to be a portal. I think a nice interface is very important since people will come back more often if so. The relevance of search results make its 'Feeling Lucky' feature pretty useful. Firefox address bar by defaults goes to 1 site listed on your search results. Google has tried to stay away from Spam/ misleading sites better than other search engines. Cons of Google: However, few problems with google, its web crawler dosen't capture hyperlinks from PDF files stored on net, a feature which Yahoo provides. Also, Google at present does not provide an index for video aggregation through the web crawler, a feature which Altavista provided since 1999. The problems include accuracy of the media file. That is the reason for providing Google Videos where users have to submit videos. Due to a larger share of 'searching' community, Google has been targeted by bloggers by planting Google Bombs. Because most bloggers mention the word failure with President Bush's name, the #1 site on searching Failure is the website of President Bush. Yahoo is doing pretty good research in Search Technologies, for example Grokker. http://www.grokker.com/grokker.html?query=Anirudh%20Koul&Yahoo=true&Daypop=true&numResults=250
spiderman??? at Yahoo! Answers Visit the source
Other answers
First of all, you seem to be pretty serious about the project. Given my opinion, if you want to beat Yahoo, Google, you simply need to make a search engine with artificial intelligence, i.e. you start asking questions to it and it replies to you correspondingly. "How can I learn Taekwandoo?" and gives in replies all the sites which have a sort of introduction / FAQ , etc in a manner as a human is replying. I can agree, we need to fast forward ourselves in the future by about 25- 30 years to make that happen. You can agree that there is no deal for you to make a new search engine, if it dosen't offer anything new beside Google and Yahoo. Google is my favourite search engine, but still its not the absolute for all searches. At the bottom part of my answer, I have done some analysis of Google in todays date. Lastly as a suggestion to one of my previous question, I was informed to go about Blog search. Traditional search engines simply crawl the network to find pages to add to their listing, but this approach does not work in a blogging environment, where you may have 100,000 pages updated in less than a day. The question is, how do you arrange your search network to accept pings from pages when they are updated as well as simply crawling? This is the problem that Technorati and Icerocket, among others, are working on. http://www.technorati.com/ http://www.icerocket.com/ ANALYSIS OF GOOGLE Pros of Google: As a seach engine, google has the best relevance and presents the results in a way that I find easy to decide what pages are best for me. Its the best in terms of researching information. For makin money, a #1 on google is worth many times more than a #1 on yahoo. Yahoo! blocks the top of the SERPs with sponsored ads. Google also has a neat interface. Yahoo is not bad too, but its interface is not that neat. The reason for that being it to be a portal. I think a nice interface is very important since people will come back more often if so. The relevance of search results make its 'Feeling Lucky' feature pretty useful. Firefox address bar by defaults goes to 1 site listed on your search results. Google has tried to stay away from Spam/ misleading sites better than other search engines. Cons of Google: However, few problems with google, its web crawler dosen't capture hyperlinks from PDF files stored on net, a feature which Yahoo provides. Also, Google at present does not provide an index for video aggregation through the web crawler, a feature which Altavista provided since 1999. The problems include accuracy of the media file. That is the reason for providing Google Videos where users have to submit videos. Due to a larger share of 'searching' community, Google has been targeted by bloggers by planting Google Bombs. Because most bloggers mention the word failure with President Bush's name, the #1 site on searching Failure is the website of President Bush. Yahoo is doing pretty good research in Search Technologies, for example Grokker. http://www.grokker.com/grokker.html?query=Anirudh%20Koul&Yahoo=true&Daypop=true&numResults=250
Anirudh Koul
Alexandra
Related Q & A:
- What are some ways I can make a little money?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
- What does make a car engine technically a six pack?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
- What are some part time jobs I can make a living by?Best solution by wikihow.com
- What are 10 businesses that can make a lot of money?Best solution by ehow.com
- What makes one search engine better than another?Best solution by Quora
Just Added Q & A:
- How many active mobile subscribers are there in China?Best solution by Quora
- How to find the right vacation?Best solution by bookit.com
- How To Make Your Own Primer?Best solution by thekrazycouponlady.com
- How do you get the domain & range?Best solution by ChaCha
- How do you open pop up blockers?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
For every problem there is a solution! Proved by Solucija.
-
Got an issue and looking for advice?
-
Ask Solucija to search every corner of the Web for help.
-
Get workable solutions and helpful tips in a moment.
Just ask Solucija about an issue you face and immediately get a list of ready solutions, answers and tips from other Internet users. We always provide the most suitable and complete answer to your question at the top, along with a few good alternatives below.