Why are some (not all) Christians so upset at having to remove Christian symbols from public spaces?
-
Imagine our public spaces jam-packed with hundreds of religious symbols from all the various religions of all our citizens..it would be madness, that is the other option. In a secular society freedom of religion is a right for all citizens as is freedom from religion for those citizens who don't follow a religion, we can't all have our religious symbols in court houses and schools and public squares so let's have none and let's stop the whingeing about being persecuted when we are asked to remove them. Have them at home and in our places of worship and other private spaces where they belong...isn't that just very reasonable and fair?
-
Answer:
There was such a controversy in my country portugal mostly catholic. There was nearly a civil war among those who supported keeping the crucifixes on school room walls, and the other who wanted them out. They would be out, as for me, at least in schools where there are students with other creeds. In the schools of larger cities there is a very mixed population of students, ethnically speaking (in some schools there are immigrants or children of immigrants from africa - cabo verde, angola, st. tomé, mozambique - asia - goa, east timor, china - america - brazil - europe - romania, moldova, ukrania - and right now it's a big culture pool. Some argue that the roots of our civilization are christian. We even have christian symbology in our flag. But the state is supposedly secular and there is freedom of religion choice by constitution. Finally the ministery of education said (to please everybody) that the schools that still carried symbols (which in fact were just the oldest) could keep them in case of no complaints from the students. My opinion is, religion is for sunday school. Keep the symbols there. P.S. have you heard about the controversy when the European Union was working on a Constitution? Many supported there should be a mention to the long-lived Christian tradition in Europe, others were against it.
EarthAng... at Yahoo! Answers Visit the source
Other answers
I don't think I agree. Think about it like this: allowing smoking (for example) in a public place forces me to breathe second-hand smoke every time I visit. I can't choose to breathe any other way; I can't have "freedom from smoke". However, allowing the display of Christian symbols in a public place does not force me to become Christian. I can choose to believe whatever I want; I can have freedom from religion. PS You don't live in a secular society. Why are public schools closed on 25th December? EDIT: In response to your comments - I think I agree with you as far as your definition of 'public space' seems to go (i.e. government-owned spaces like courts and schools).
bonshui
I couldn't agree more. The first problem is, most people only want symbols of their faith placed in public. There would never be any sort of agreement on which symbols could be there and which couldn't. Religion is a private matter, not a public one. If not being able to place a symbol of your faith in a public faith is your biggest concern, you have serious faith issues to begin with. Place all of the symbols of your faith you want on your property. Build a life-sized Last Supper on your lawn, I don't care. Just don't expect me to fund it with my tax dollars. The US was founded as a secular society, not a religious one. Nothing irritates me more than people who claim that we are a Christian nation, nothing is further from the truth. We weren't founded as one and we're not one. I realize you're in the UK, the word whinge gave it away :), but when I read answers from people in the US claiming things that are historically false, I jump on my little soap box.
Seraphina
freedom of speech seems to have gone to many religions
spagelooker
This country is based on freedom of religions, but it's true foundation is belief in God,...and it just so happens that our fore fathers beliefs were based on Christiantiy. In God We Trust,..and so we shall and should to keep Gods blessings and to keep what He's given us here in this Great Nation. God says He will never leave us or foresake us,...but if we turn from Him and don't call on His name, I think He'd be less likely to come to our aid. God's not going to butt in where He's not wanted. Pull the foundation out from under a building,..and what do you have?...something that will just crumble.
rhanjo
yes
bertvansanten
totally agree with you, in england you are made to feel ashamed of having your own countrys flag up, children are sent home because thay are wearing the union jack, at my childrens school they have been taught about everyother religion going and we have a child at the school who is given special treatment because of there religion, all of these are examples of human rights gone mad, i have no issues with other peoples beliefs BUT dont want to see it everywhere i go and dont want to be harrased by them either keep your religions to yourself and then everyone will be happy.
leanne74
It is quite reasonable and fair. However, some believers are not the same way. They find it offensive that anyone would question their faith. In their minds this hyper-sensitivity makes them devout...when it's more likely that they are just insecure. Forcing them to keep their symbols to themselves, or at least out of the public sphere (that which is funded by ALL tax-payers) implies that their faith just might be misplaced. In reality, our Constitution grants freedon for all religions, not just one. Putting religious symbols in public spaces would suggest that the state was partial. This rule is not in place because the founders of our country didn't believe in Christianity, it's in place because they believed in creating a system that was fair to believers of any (or no) religion. Historically, Christians are notorious for using the strength of their beliefs and the missionary stance of their churches and bibles as an excuse to subjugate non-believers. While you can't entirely deny them credit for the passion of their beliefs you can certainly fault them for being close-minded and intolerant.
sandman
Related Q & A:
- Why is it important to have a Public Relations campaign?Best solution by wemagazineforwomen.com
- Why is public transportation in India so inefficient?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
- Why do some people say Philly public schools are horrible?Best solution by Answerbag.com
- Why do Christians support Israel?Best solution by Quora
- Why do Christians believe in a kind God?Best solution by why.do
Just Added Q & A:
- How many active mobile subscribers are there in China?Best solution by Quora
- How to find the right vacation?Best solution by bookit.com
- How To Make Your Own Primer?Best solution by thekrazycouponlady.com
- How do you get the domain & range?Best solution by ChaCha
- How do you open pop up blockers?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
For every problem there is a solution! Proved by Solucija.
-
Got an issue and looking for advice?
-
Ask Solucija to search every corner of the Web for help.
-
Get workable solutions and helpful tips in a moment.
Just ask Solucija about an issue you face and immediately get a list of ready solutions, answers and tips from other Internet users. We always provide the most suitable and complete answer to your question at the top, along with a few good alternatives below.