Why does this generation seem so abundant with danger and possible death?
-
Just wondered, because when you think about it, this generation lives in a world that is likely to be destroyed in any possible way. Hundreds of years ago, super volcanoes, asteroids, nuclear wars etc weren't an issue, they had all been and gone. But now we seem to live in an age where all this is overdue or about to happen. Yellowstone is overdue by a few thousand years, there are asteroids larger than a few football fields heading towards us and global tensions are making nuclear war a reality. Is this just because of the communication of our age, the searching the sky, studying the earths activities etc. Also, as a bonus question, how long do you think the human race will survive before it becomes extinct? I'd say about 500 years. Max. After that, if we haven't left earth, we will be killed by pollution, asteroid, volcanoes etc.
-
Answer:
"Hundreds of years ago, super volcanoes, asteroids, nuclear wars etc weren't an issue, they had all been and gone." In the year 1300 the population of England was about 5 million. In the year 1400 it was about 2.5 million. Much the same applies for the whole of Europe. Actually, something like one third of the entire population of Europe, the Middle East and vast tracts of Asia died between about 1325 and 1355; within only three decades for an area extending across from China in the east, India in the southeast right the way across up to Iceland and the shores of Greenland.. Take a look at life during the 14th century and then consider whether you find yourself facing anything like the same levels of danger. For example, are you presently at imminent death due to famine, warfare or plague? Or do you view experiencing next New Year's Day with a good degree of confidence?
Reece at Yahoo! Answers Visit the source
Other answers
First, our risk of of death from super volcanos and astroids is exactly the same now as it was a couple hundred years ago. Even 1000 years is nothing compared to geologic time. The only difference is that we know a lot more about what these risks actually are now. As far as war and global anihilation, there has been some improvement and the risk is not quite so great as it was, say 50 years ago. We came quite close to nuclear war several times, with the Soviet Union during the Cuban Missle Crisis and, before that, with "Red" China during the Korean War. Since than, the "big" nuclear powers (USA, USSR, and PRC) have actually destroyed a lot of the nuclear weapons (and the USSR does not exist anymore). Even though the "big" nuclear powers have been somewhat succssful at preventing "proliferation" of nuclear weapons, India, Pakistan, and North Korea have all tested nuclear devices (may or may not be deliverable as weapons).
Gary H
Related Q & A:
- Why do Wordpress rewriites seem to work differently for posts vs pages?Best solution by WordPress
- What are the four most abundant gases in earth's crust?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
- Why do mean and deceitful people seem to always get ahead?Best solution by answers.yahoo.com
- Why are there distant winds that seem far away, yet it is peaceful here?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
- Why do eyes cloud black after death?Best solution by scienceforums.net
Just Added Q & A:
- How many active mobile subscribers are there in China?Best solution by Quora
- How to find the right vacation?Best solution by bookit.com
- How To Make Your Own Primer?Best solution by thekrazycouponlady.com
- How do you get the domain & range?Best solution by ChaCha
- How do you open pop up blockers?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
For every problem there is a solution! Proved by Solucija.
-
Got an issue and looking for advice?
-
Ask Solucija to search every corner of the Web for help.
-
Get workable solutions and helpful tips in a moment.
Just ask Solucija about an issue you face and immediately get a list of ready solutions, answers and tips from other Internet users. We always provide the most suitable and complete answer to your question at the top, along with a few good alternatives below.