Compare 3 groups using stats.5 variables are sig different between groups.How do I control for the variables?
-
I have 3 groups that are based on a clinical characteristic. I am looking at five outcome variables. There are 5 independent variables that are significantly different between the groups. I ran regressions on all of the outcome variables for the entire group and for the 3 subgroups based on my clinical characteristic to see which variables could be used to predict the outcomes. How do I control for the significantly different independent variables in the analyses or have I already done it by running the analyses for each of the subgroups. I am stumped as to whether I have done enough. I have run chi square for the categorical variables, ANOVA for the continuous variables, Pearson and Spearman correlations and regressions appropriate for the type of outcome variable I have. Does the fact that some of the independent variables are different across the groups mean anything now? HELP. I am using SPSS to analyze the data.
-
Answer:
I am a clinical statistician. Are the five outcome variables clinically, not statistically related. For example, five outcome variables from the same scale. If so you need to use statisticial methodology that simultaneously controls for multiple endpoints. Otherwise, you need to control for multiplicity. But this depends on the hypothesis(es) you have in mind. With more detail I can answer your question. If the outcome variables are dependent (say correlation > 0.66) then you need to use MANOVA. Another means is to use proc mixed in SAS using a dependent covariance structure. Cannot help with SPSS. I am a SAS user.
John C at Yahoo! Answers Visit the source
Other answers
i think you need a separate control group for the independent variables a group you do not apply the treatment to but test as a control
you can treat "group" as a discrete variable with three levels. introducing a main effect for 'group' into the regression will fit parallel regression surfaces for the three groups that differ by their intercepts. if you add also two-factor interactions between 'group' and each of the independent variables (including quadratic and higher terms if you used them), that will be equivalent to fitting regressions separately for the three groups. you can then test to see if the model with the 'group' two-factor interactions gives a significantly better fit than the model with just the main effect for 'group'. that some independent variables are significantly different between groups should not affect the preceding analysis.
bbp8
Related Q & A:
- How can I trick SSH to connect using different configurations based on current location?Best solution by Server Fault
- How would I control a JCarousel inside another JCarousel?Best solution by stackoverflow.com
- How do I compare two tables with the same column definitions in different schemas?Best solution by Database Administrators
- How can I control the volume of my TV with my Virgin Media remote control?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
- How can I control my time?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
Just Added Q & A:
- How many active mobile subscribers are there in China?Best solution by Quora
- How to find the right vacation?Best solution by bookit.com
- How To Make Your Own Primer?Best solution by thekrazycouponlady.com
- How do you get the domain & range?Best solution by ChaCha
- How do you open pop up blockers?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
For every problem there is a solution! Proved by Solucija.
-
Got an issue and looking for advice?
-
Ask Solucija to search every corner of the Web for help.
-
Get workable solutions and helpful tips in a moment.
Just ask Solucija about an issue you face and immediately get a list of ready solutions, answers and tips from other Internet users. We always provide the most suitable and complete answer to your question at the top, along with a few good alternatives below.