Is There An Easier Way To Count Back Money?

Isn't the fact that mostly men commit crimes that involve money and stuff like,...(discussion style),...?

• ,...robbing homes and stores where they steal jewerly pretty much a reflection that too men men are spending too much money on women these days such as paying for too many dates and buying them jewerly that's too pricey where there's not enough it the other way around? It was one thing and much more acceptable many years ago, like even as recent as the 1950s for most men to do most of the spending in the relationship because they had more employment and money-making opportunities than women back in those days, the woman needed to be taken care of by the man and the woman was a house wife. But now, now that women are also having jobs that pay enough to be able to take care of themselves, it's not unfair and wrong. If most men were still making significantly more money than women where they could afford such spending and still have money left over to save in the bank, then it'd be more understandable, but now that men no longer have such an automatic advantage over women in terms of employment and money like they did back in times like the 40s, 50s, and 60s, and probably not to mention even moreso back in the 1800s, it's now wrong for men to do all the spending. Men need to start demanding women spend money on them. Women need to start doing all the spending on dates for a change. That money has to come from somewhere, you know, and now that women have those jobs and are even taking those jobs from men, then those same women still expecting men to spend money on them would be like adding insult to injury. Geee, first she takes that high-paying job instead YET NOW she STILL expects him to spend on her when yet she's the one making more money? That's totally wrong. She should spend on him, if anything. And money spend on cosmetics and clothes don't count. Men eat more and thus face a higher food bill, plus the fact that no one's making those women spend at high-priced stores, they can still be sexy by spending at places like Wal-Mart or K-Mart where the prices are obviously much lower. Even if men act like it's not a big deal, deep down, the unfairness probably tears away at them and their subconscious demand for monetary equality can make them more likely to commit crimes such as armed robbery, forgery, burgulary, embezzelment, and any other monetary-raleted crimes. And no, men should not have to spend money on women to make those women want foreplay and sex with them, those men should be able to make those women want them sexually even without dating, besides, with all of the unfortunate girl-girl stuff going on which you see in Youtube videos, look, if women don't need to spend money or date women to fulfill their bisexual fantasies, then since all women should prefer men over women, then by logic, this means that men should also not have to spend money on women either AND should be able to sexually win over women even faster, quicker, and easier than women trying to do the same thing, and even those women persuing women should also prefer men over women as well and be even more willing to get sexual with men instead, and with it obviously also being for free as well. Am I the only one who realizes this, or do others totally understand what I'm saying and also agree with me? I hope there are also women who totally agree with me as well as men who totally agree with me.

• Answer:

  I definately agree