Can you call a witness for a pre-hearing at the Employment tribunal?

International security meltdown occurs in care homes?

• A service user uses a mobile phone to get people to secretly witness abuse, even behavior complaints since they are not meant to occur against people with a mental disability. In fact it is the evidencing of this behavior complaints that make up most of the reports of abuse to the 'care standards agency' in this situation, because people with mental disabilities are not responsible for thier behaviour. This is what has been written by them... During this time, I have been told about a new apparent breakthrough that has occurred. I was told that I can have the staff work weekends during the night; which does provide security at night from outside people. The problem is that this is not the priority area that we need to look at. Part of the process of asking for staff doing a lot of hours is to ensure that I get more daytime hours as a tactical measure; it was not intended as a method to increase night working. Because of the past issues with behaviour complaints from staff complaining that I am making too much noise at night, it would lead to some serious problems. Gold standard security will be needed for if they start getting angry, which would mean using the ‘Behaviour complaints security’ procedure; and since this could be a regular occurrence in this situation, it could mean that I cause pandemonium. For instance, repeatedly getting the care quality commission to witness behaviour complaints, and repeatedly getting my parents to try and help me to stop this occurring at strange hours of the night when they tell me that the staff’s behaviour is not a problem, in some kind of attempt to prevent these complaints occurring. The fact that I have to move house, I have no choice to be awake at night looking for a place to live; this means being awake at night annoying the sleeping staff; not only that but there is no where uncluttered for them to sleep. The ceiling is like a drum and the living areas are above the bedrooms, this would lead to a lot of noise. If the staff are awake with me, this would lead to problems with them being able to stay awake in the daytime and during the weekdays at night; it would be very strange hours for the staff. The priority for me is to have on-call staff, and then extra staff working daytime hours, followed by other things like transport; this is what is in my letter to the funding panel. My mother does not advice trying to change what the funding panel have done; she thinks this would annoy them. If things get out of control, it could lead to a situation where one staff member after another is being fired, a mass employment termination scenario. Although the other services user would have less staff looking after them, it could also protect them from behaviour complaints. A record with evidence of this scenario would need to be kept for scientists to be able to do something about the behaviour complaints phenomenon, due to the evidence. Theoretically if that well known about, other people may copy this evidencing technique if they find out about it; this would in turn fuel this scenario even more, and so a chain reaction would occur that spreads like an infection around the country and even the world. Though doing this should save many lives, the care security system would go into an international meltdown, since I know of no security system like mine anywhere. There are behaviour complaints occuring every day with this person, and it is an a problem in all care homes, completes with abuse in many of them. This is what people who have been to many of these places claim to feel. What do think of this situation? CREED

• Answer:

  I like potatoes