What makes computers run slow?

Would this laptop run games like Skyrim, Civ 5?

  • I can't choose between two computers, because I don't know which would be best for playing games like these (If either of them run them at all) One has an AMD Quad-Core A8-3520M (With 1.6GHz and a 4MB L2 Cache, and is a dedicated card) The other has an Intel Core i5-2450M (Which is 2.5GHz, with a 3MB L3 Cache, BUT is only a Dual Core, and is an integrated graphics card) The main thing confusing me is that I don't know if the fact that the 1.6 GHz one would be able to run a game requiring 2.0GHz, because it is Quad-core, or if the number of cores makes any difference at all. Please help! Thanks :)

  • Answer:

    Integrated GPUs aren't really suggested for gaming. Discrete graphics are almost always better since they're usually perform better than integrated cards, so have no question about that part. (But make sure it's a good dedicated graphics card) Intel is a brand that I like, they're reliable and advanced when compared to AMD processors, and you know the Sandy Bridge processors perform pretty well. The archtitecture of the processor is really important too, and don't just look at the number of cores or the clock speed. If I were you, I'd go with the i5 although it has integrated graphics... Tough one. About the games, how you'll run them depends on the GPU. If you've got a nice discrete GPU, then your laptop will run them, although don't expect it to run them at very detailed graphics on a full HD (1920x1080) monitor. Even most desktop cards can't do that for Skyrim, and desktop cards are better. Civ5 needs a lot of processing power, although both of the given processors could handle it to an extent. My 2010 Asus with an i7-740QM (Quad-Core @1.73 GHz, 6 MB L3 Cache, GPU: ATI Mobility Radeon 5730) handled it well in DirectX 9. Not sure about Skyrim though, it's a graphics-hungry game.

Bob at Yahoo! Answers Visit the source

Was this solution helpful to you?

Other answers

Honestly, I wouldn't buy either of those. The game will usually state the minimum requirements, meaning you need at least 2.0GHz but you really should have more than that. The cores don't really make any difference, that just means you can be doing two (or four) different tasks at once. Each core would be handling one task. Another thing you need to look into is TurboBoosting. This is a technology pioneered by Intel, which allows cores to work together to boost the Hz, generally by 0.8-0.9 GHz, but doesn't hurt the processor, unlike overclocking. Some applications take advantage of multiple cores to boost the GHz not unlike TurboBoost, but not all. Also for gaming you really need a dedicated graphics card, so neither of those laptops would be ideal. If you have too, you could probably get by with the first one, especially if it has TurboBoost or if the games support multiple cores.

Jerlig12

If you want a laptop for gaming you should focus more on the video card. to see if an videocard is good, you should look for benchmarks on the internet.

Flash_93

"That's not good enough." -Will Turner

Nick

Related Q & A:

Just Added Q & A:

Find solution

For every problem there is a solution! Proved by Solucija.

  • Got an issue and looking for advice?

  • Ask Solucija to search every corner of the Web for help.

  • Get workable solutions and helpful tips in a moment.

Just ask Solucija about an issue you face and immediately get a list of ready solutions, answers and tips from other Internet users. We always provide the most suitable and complete answer to your question at the top, along with a few good alternatives below.