Exciting Iceland Vacations?

ICELAND HAS MORE BALLS than the SEC , WHY HAVE WE NOT PUNISHED OUR CORRUPT BANKERS?

  • Bankers jailed, sued as Iceland seeks culprits for crisis By Haukur Holm (AFP) – May 12, 2010 REYKJAVIK — More than a year and a half after Iceland's major banks failed, all but sinking the country's economy, police have begun rounding up a number of top bankers while other former executives and owners face a two-billion-dollar lawsuit. Since Iceland's three largest banks -- Kaupthing, Landsbanki and Glitnir -- collapsed in late 2008, their former executives and owners have largely been living untroubled lives abroad. But the publication last month of a parliamentary inquiry into the island nation's profound financial and economic crisis signaled a turning of the tide, laying much of the blame for the downfall on the former bank heads who had taken "inappropriate loans from the banks" they worked for. On Wednesday, the administrators of Glitnir's liquidation announced they had filed a two-billion-dollar (1.6-billion-euro) lawsuit in a New York court against former large shareholders and executives for alleged fraud. "I think this lawsuit is without precedence in Iceland," Steinunn Gudbjartsdottir, who chairs Glitnir's so-called winding-up board, told reporters in Reykjavik. "It is about higher figures than we have ever seen," she said, adding that she expected Glitnir to file more lawsuits going forward, but that "it is unlikely any will be this big." Glitnir said it was suing "Jon Asgeir Johannesson, formerly its principal shareholder, Larus Welding, previously Glitnir's chief executive, Thorstein Jonsson, its former chairman and other former directors, shareholders and third parties associates with Johannesson for fraudulently and unlawfully draining more than two billion dollars out of the bank." The bank also said it was "taking action against its former auditors PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) for facilitating and helping to conceal the fraudulent transactions engineered by Johannesson and his associates, which ultimately led to the bank's collapse in October 2008." Glitnir's suit, filed in the New York state Supreme Court on Tuesday, blamed most of the bank's woes on "Johannesson and his co-conspirators," who had "conspired to systematically loot Glitnir Bank in order to prop up their own failing companies." Johannesson, the former owner of the now-defunct Baugur investment group with stakes in a number of British high street stores including Hamleys, Debenhams and House of Fraser, said he was shocked by the lawsuit. "The distortions and the nonsense in the lawsuit are incredible," he told the Pressan news website. Glitnir's administrators "can get a 10-year-prison sentence for misusing US courts in this manner," he insisted. The bank's chief administrator Gudbjartsdottir took his comments in stride. "I didn't expect him to be happy with the lawsuit," she said. In addition to its New York suit, Glitnir said it had "secured a freezing order from the High Court in London against Jon Asgeir Johannesson's worldwide assets, including two apartments in Manhattan's exclusive Gramercy Park neighbourhood for which he paid approximately 25 million dollars." Gudbjartsdottir said Johannesson had just 48 hours to come up with a satisfactory list of his assets. "If he does not give the right information he faces a jail sentence," she said. Four former Kaupthing executives, who all live in Luxembourg, have meanwhile been arrested in Iceland in the past week and Interpol has issued an international arrest warrant for that bank's ex-chairman, Sigurdur Einarsson. Former head of the bank's domestic operations, Ingolfur Helgason, and former chief risk officer Steingrimur Karason were arrested late Monday on arrival from Luxembourg, just days after former Kaupthing boss Hreidar Mar Sigurdsson, along with Magnus Gudmunsson, who headed the bank's unit in Luxembourg, were taken into custody. The 49-year-old Einarsson, who lives in London, said late Tuesday he had no plans to travel to Iceland to be arrested. "I'm absolutely flabbergasted about the latest news," he told the Frettabladid daily. "There is in my opinion no need for the arrests or custody rulings, and I will not of my own free will take part in the play that it appears is being staged to soothe the Icelandic people," he said. "I'll put the human rights I enjoy here in Britain to the test and will not therefore come home (to Iceland) to these conditions without being forced," he added.

  • Answer:

    U.S. politicians and court members have to much to lose?

Brainchild O at Yahoo! Answers Visit the source

Was this solution helpful to you?

Other answers

because our court system is just as corrupted

The corrupt bankers paid the corrupt politicians, that's why! The bankers are not the only ones at fault here. This kind of problem did not happen in Canadian banks, you know why? Because politicians did not force banks to take loans they knew would never be paid. Now that the cat is out of the bag, the politicians are running and hiding behind regulations, the regulations they never enforced. The regulations they were paid to ignore! The regulations the socialist organizations pushed on the banks, like ACORN. They stood in front of banks and hampered business until the bank loaned money to minorities that could not pay them back. Then the gov steps in and makes them loan the money. Then people borrowed money they KNEW they could not pay back, just to get a house. So who is really at fault in all this, just the banks? Or is it corrupt politicians, corrupt ACORN, or corrupt people knowingly taking loans they could not afford? Or are they ALL at fault?

Related Q & A:

Just Added Q & A:

Find solution

For every problem there is a solution! Proved by Solucija.

  • Got an issue and looking for advice?

  • Ask Solucija to search every corner of the Web for help.

  • Get workable solutions and helpful tips in a moment.

Just ask Solucija about an issue you face and immediately get a list of ready solutions, answers and tips from other Internet users. We always provide the most suitable and complete answer to your question at the top, along with a few good alternatives below.