How to estimate water usage?

ESTIMATE WATER USAGE. Help PLEASE!?

  • An average family of four uses roughly 1200 liters (about 300 gallons) of water per day. (One liter = 1000 cm3.) How much depth would a lake lose per year if it uniformly covered an area of 90 square kilometers and supplied a local town with a population of 40000 people? Consider only population uses, and neglect evaporation and so on. I'd do really appreciate any help for this problem!

  • Answer:

    Calc the total volume of water used in a year: V = 1200 (1000 liters/cm3) / [(100 cm/m) (100 cm/m) (100 cm/m)] (40000) (365 days) = () meters cubed Now divide that by the area of the lake to get depth A = 90 (1000) (1000) = () meters squared Depth = V / A meters

Tommy at Yahoo! Answers Visit the source

Was this solution helpful to you?

Other answers

You need more information on the lake for an accurate answer. The area says nothing about the volume. Consider the possibility that the whole lake is only 6" deep. More likely, it will be very shallow in some areas and deeper in others.

Calc the total volume of water used in a year: V = 1200 (1000 liters/cm3) / [(100 cm/m) (100 cm/m) (100 cm/m)] (40000) (365 days) = () meters cubed Now divide that by the area of the lake to get depth A = 90 (1000) (1000) = () meters squared Depth = V / A meters

You need more information on the lake for an accurate answer. The area says nothing about the volume. Consider the possibility that the whole lake is only 6" deep. More likely, it will be very shallow in some areas and deeper in others.

Born Yesterday

Related Q & A:

Just Added Q & A:

Find solution

For every problem there is a solution! Proved by Solucija.

  • Got an issue and looking for advice?

  • Ask Solucija to search every corner of the Web for help.

  • Get workable solutions and helpful tips in a moment.

Just ask Solucija about an issue you face and immediately get a list of ready solutions, answers and tips from other Internet users. We always provide the most suitable and complete answer to your question at the top, along with a few good alternatives below.