Is the Samsung Galaxy Ace A LOT better than the Samsung Galaxy Fit?

Buy the Orange San Francisco II. It's better than Galaxy Ace and costs just £ 89,99. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=whZvKxwytnY

The comparison between the two goes deeper than just their cameras. You can't go wrong with any of them if I'm honest. They're both great. However, if you can afford the Ace, go for it. It's amazing and often dubbed as the 'poor man's iphone'. It has everything you'd want. The Ace has a better built screen than the Fit, since it is made from 'corning gorilla glass'. The Fit also isn't as responsive as the Ace, though it still generally is anyway. The Ace has a more vibrant, colourful display at 16 million colours, whereas the Fit has a vibrant but still mere 65k colours. The Ace also has a more powerful CPU rate/processor at 800 Mhz, whereas the Fit has a mere 600 Mhz. The video quality of the Ace is also better than the Fit at 24fps, whereas the Fit only has 15fps. The Fit also doesn't come complete with a flash for the camera, whereas the Ace does. The Fit in my opinion just doesn't have adequate enough features for its price. In my opinion, it's best to push your budget a bit further as the Ace, believe me, is worth it. The Ace is definitely worth the additional £30 or so, since it offers literally everything. The Fit just comes a bit short at every feature it offers. But the Ace on the other hand, offers all the features of a high-end device. ............... And as of the San Francisco offer of the above commentor, the Sony Ericson WT19i offers the complete package equivalent to any high-end device without the awful battery life and the brand-name of the San Francisco. It has everything basically, and costs only £90 at its cheapest. However, it would be from virgin network, but it is worth the great device. It has a front facing, as well as a 5 megapixel camera with flash and even a HD video recorder. It's ultimately customazible than several android phones I know too, and has got a 'corning gorilla glass with a sharp 16 million colour display. The software, also is an up-to-date 2.3 gingerbread android. The battery life is better than average too compared to the majority of android phones. So in case you decide not to have either of these samsungs, this sony ericsson is an absolute perfect device, and way cheaper than the price it was supposed to be. Since it is a sony ericsson phone, the sound quality is great too with a speaker setting as well as the typical enhanced volume. Like I said, it has everything. I wouldn't agree less if you said it's to good to be true, but believe me it is. Since I have one in black. I'd personally suggest you research for the Sony Ericsson Wt19i. It's in fact, better than both of the Samsungs and even the San Francisco 2. If you had it, I'd assure that you'd say the same. The only reason why it's so cheap for its actual value is because the company Sony..and Ericsson have split up recently, and they're trying to out-sell they're devices quick. Therefore be quick to make a decision. It's a must-not-miss offer for anyone.

The comparison between the two goes deeper than just their cameras. You can't go wrong with any of them if I'm honest. They're both great. However, if you can afford the Ace, go for it. It's amazing and often dubbed as the 'poor man's iphone'. It has everything you'd want. The Ace has a better built screen than the Fit, since it is made from 'corning gorilla glass'. The Fit also isn't as responsive as the Ace, though it still generally is anyway. The Ace has a more vibrant, colourful display at 16 million colours, whereas the Fit has a vibrant but still mere 65k colours. The Ace also has a more powerful CPU rate/processor at 800 Mhz, whereas the Fit has a mere 600 Mhz. The video quality of the Ace is also better than the Fit at 24fps, whereas the Fit only has 15fps. The Fit also doesn't come complete with a flash for the camera, whereas the Ace does. The Fit in my opinion just doesn't have adequate enough features for its price. In my opinion, it's best to push your budget a bit further as the Ace, believe me, is worth it. The Ace is definitely worth the additional £30 or so, since it offers literally everything. The Fit just comes a bit short at every feature it offers. But the Ace on the other hand, offers all the features of a high-end device. ............... And as of the San Francisco offer of the above commentor, the Sony Ericson WT19i offers the complete package equivalent to any high-end device without the awful battery life and the brand-name of the San Francisco. It has everything basically, and costs only £90 at its cheapest. However, it would be from virgin network, but it is worth the great device. It has a front facing, as well as a 5 megapixel camera with flash and even a HD video recorder. It's ultimately customazible than several android phones I know too, and has got a 'corning gorilla glass with a sharp 16 million colour display. The software, also is an up-to-date 2.3 gingerbread android. The battery life is better than average too compared to the majority of android phones. So in case you decide not to have either of these samsungs, this sony ericsson is an absolute perfect device, and way cheaper than the price it was supposed to be. Since it is a sony ericsson phone, the sound quality is great too with a speaker setting as well as the typical enhanced volume. Like I said, it has everything. I wouldn't agree less if you said it's to good to be true, but believe me it is. Since I have one in black. I'd personally suggest you research for the Sony Ericsson Wt19i. It's in fact, better than both of the Samsungs and even the San Francisco 2. If you had it, I'd assure that you'd say the same. The only reason why it's so cheap for its actual value is because the company Sony..and Ericsson have split up recently, and they're trying to out-sell they're devices quick. Therefore be quick to make a decision. It's a must-not-miss offer for anyone.