Why don't Cons understand what Veto Proof means?

You're talking about people who think the President controls the congress.

You're talking about people who think the President controls the congress.

Wrong as usual... Is this a Democrat / Republican divided issue? NOPE... Here is the obvious answer that is always left out of these questions... He, President Obama, could have vetoed the bill to take a stance on what is wrong in these Communist based Bills and point those facts out... That would force the Congress to go on record defending all that is wrong with these bills and place those in both houses of Congress who supported these bills out-ted for all of America to see.. Then they would have to re vote their support for them... BUT.. Of course Obama by his signature refused to do his due dillagence for Americans and signed the bad laws into effect thus agreeing wholey with both Houses of Congress and shows America the he too wanted these bills... So they all sign them to give themselves dictatorial powers over the American electorate.. So try a little truth with your garbage explanations of Obama's and the Congressional hate for Freedom in America...

Actually nothing is veto proof since the presidential veto is an action, not necessarily the end result. The president can veto any bill coming across his desk and then it will be returned to Congress and they can override his veto. Sometimes a president will veto a bill as a stalling action or to let the general public know where he stands on it.

Actually nothing is veto proof since the presidential veto is an action, not necessarily the end result. The president can veto any bill coming across his desk and then it will be returned to Congress and they can override his veto. Sometimes a president will veto a bill as a stalling action or to let the general public know where he stands on it.