Can you help me in my research paper?

Can someone help with this research paper? Please! :(?

• I am so behind on a huge assignment for my political science class due to other classes and I have a big research paper due for that class.. it has to be 7 pages long but I havent started its foundation and would appreciate some help with it please. Well these are the guidelines for the paper.. please help: For this project, the student will present and analyze a current National public policy proposal. In the paper, the student will first be expected to persuasively argue each side of the issue, then advocate a definitive personal standing regarding the proper course of action in reference to the issue. then he wrote:Topic Choices One California’s governor is proposing a tax increase for high-income earners as well as a increase in the state sales tax to deal with the budget deficit. Support of Oppose 2. Re-elect President Obama? 3. Replace President Obama ? ..then he put this too:Text Requirements: Each of the following sections will be labeled in the paper. 7-11pages total 1. Introduction: set the stage for the paper, scope and purpose of the paper. You need to kindle interest in the reader here. (1-2 pages) 2. Yes/Support: Identify 2 or 3 distinct advantages or to the proposal. Take persuasive, definitive stand in support of the proposal. Your analysis here should focus upon documenting the wisdom of the policy in terms or feasibility, effectiveness, justice and cost benefit analysis toward alleviating a critical problem. (2-3 pages) 3. No/Opposition Identify 2 or 3 distinct points that demonstrate opposition to the proposal. Analysis should focus on the opposition to the proposal similar to section 2. (2-3 Pages) 4. Final Recommendation: This section takes the arguments made in section 2 and 3 and brings them together for a final recommendation on the issue being discussed. Defend your position and summarize both for and against arguments in this section (2-3 Pages) Well I chose to Replace president obama I dont get what he means about proposing a policy and then giving us topics on Obama. Well I dont know how to incorporate them to his guidelines.

• Answer:

  In your case, the proposed policy would be to "remove Obama from office". In your introduction, you should include a strong thesis statement declaring your position on the proposed policy (Obama's removal). This should be stated as a fact. For example: "In the upcoming Presidential election, President Obama should be removed from office and another politician should take his place." (When you state your position as a fact, your readers will want to continue reading because they will want to learn why you believe the way you do.) Follow your introduction with your argument "why" Obama should be removed from office, offering evidence that will help persuade your readers why removing him will benefit the nation. For example: (1) Mr. Obama's Foreign Policy advocating a meek approach to international challenges has lowered American prestige by making the US appear weak in the eyes of the international community. (2) His economic policies have failed to reduce unemployment enough to allow the US economy to recover from the current recession. (3) He committed our US troops to war zones in Libya and sent US military advisers to the African Congo without Congressional approval. In doing this, he has excluded the representatives of the American people from participating in the process of deciding whether or not we wanted to involve ourselves in these conflicts. The decision was made without the consent of the American People; Obama ignored the will of the People by preventing the opportunity for us to object. Next, since your teacher asked you to present an opposing argument, write two or three reasons to persuade your readers why some people believe Obama should not be removed from office. For example: (1) Mr. Obama has not had enough time in office to carry out his long-term plans that may benefit the nation if they are allowed to be completed through his winning of a second term. (2) Mr. Obama has goals for our home-produced energy that should be allowed to continue. His proposal to create an oil pipeline will help America to produce and transport more of its own oil, thus reducing our nation's dependence on foreign sources of oil. If Mr. Obama is removed from office, this policy may not be carried out by his successor. And (3) Obama has pledged to end America's involvement in Afghanistan. If he remains in office, he will be able to oversee the withdrawal of US troops and forge a new, post-war relationship with the Afghan government. Your teacher's "Final Recommendation" asks you to summarize the two arguments, for and against the removal of Obama, and wants you to "defend" your position on the issue. Conclude with a brief statement asserting "why" removing Obama from office is a better, and perhaps more important decision than allowing him to return for a second term.