Find solution
How to tune into the quantum field?

How does 'Quantum Field Theory' address the problem of Locality in Quantum Entanglement?

  • Quantum Entanglement allows spatially separated entangled particles to have impact on each other instantly (overcoming the allowed speed-limit of causal influence which is 'c'). How does Quantum Field Theory address this problem (protecting causality and chronology)?

  • Answer:

    The answer to your question is unfortunately easy: There is no Quantum Field Theory. No one knows how it works. There is no protecting causality and chronology because time doesn't really exist in the form we think it does. (If you're willing to go beyond the stodgy halls of academia for an answer and out into the real world, this is demonstrated in macro environments in the form of precognition.) Fortunately though, 'c' (speed of light limit) is not violated because the information does not travel. it is instantaneously in both places at once. Physics is ever so grudgingly going down the path of the acceptance of consciousness models of physics to explain entanglement and the observation effect, but it is a very slow process and physicists are not well equipped to deal with that sort of phenomena. (It requires testing the interaction of people and machines, which puts it into the realm of parapsychology. They're not keen on that at all.) String theory is a dead end despite what you may have heard.

Amritasya_Putra at Answerbag.com Visit the source

Was this solution helpful to you?

Other answers

Dear Amritasya, I find your question interesting but confess to being unable to provide an intelligent response. It appears that you are attempting to occupy a niche in Answerbag that has not been begging to be filled. I hope I'm wrong. I don't know how many particle physicists, cosmologists, and such are Answerbag members. I do, however, expect that there are several who find your topics interesting. It's troubling though that you are not getting many responses. I fear that the casual reader might be thinking you are simply trying to dazzle us with your questions and that they might not be sincere. In fact, I confess that the thought had occurred to me. But that thought faded this time when it popped up again after seeing that you had provided a description. I don't think you'd go to that trouble if you were merely seeking attention. So - for now - I'm going to take you to be serious when you submit these. In that spirit, I wish you luck but fear you might have chosen the wrong forum for such inquiries. I am a retired earth and environmental scientist who specialized in cloud dynamics and glacial geomorphology. My limited knowledge in those fields is not harvested to any significant degree on Answerbag yet I still enjoy it even though I get way outside of my range of knowledge. In fact, I get down to gut-level intuition mostly based upon my varied experiences in life. I hope that you find Answerbag to be worth your while. I also wish that you would provide YOUR view more often somewhere within the framework of the entries you make - perhaps in the Discussion portion or as a separate entry shortly after you ask the question. That would indeed make it more educational for those of us who are interested. Very Truly Yours, Cloudman

cloudman

No, the entanglement does not lead to cause-and-effect. What you do to one particle does not "cause" the other one to do anything. You cannot transmit any information from one particle to the other via the entanglement. Entanglement leads to coincidences only.

purplecows

Related Q & A:

Just Added Q & A:

Find solution

For every problem there is a solution! Proved by Solucija.

  • Got an issue and looking for advice?

  • Ask Solucija to search every corner of the Web for help.

  • Get workable solutions and helpful tips in a moment.

Just ask Solucija about an issue you face and immediately get a list of ready solutions, answers and tips from other Internet users. We always provide the most suitable and complete answer to your question at the top, along with a few good alternatives below.