Is the creative approach appropriate for the target audience?

When trying to generate critical mass for a website, which approach is better? Go for a global audience upfront or target a small niche first, generate hype, then expand?

  • Answer:

    "A huge challenge for user-generated websites is overcoming the chicken-and-egg problem: attracting users and contributors when you are starting with zero content. One way to approach this challenge is to use what Geoffrey Moore calls the bowling pinstrategy: find a niche where the chicken-and-egg problem is more easily overcome and then find ways to hop from that niche to other niches and eventually to the broader market." Longer essay at Chris Dixon's blog: http://cdixon.org/2010/08/21/the-bowling-pin-strategy/

Ben Pieratt at Quora Visit the source

Was this solution helpful to you?

Other answers

I think the evidence seems to be in favor of narrow niche first. But there are ambiguities. eBay (possibly apocryphal): Pez dispensers Amazon: books backlist Netflix: the canonical 'long tail' example For UGC sites, it gets more interesting. Niche is both an asset and a liability, as with Quora and the techie early-adopter crowd. As Facebook (Harvard/Ivy League first  vertical) shows, it is possible to outgrow your initial-traction niche. I can't think of any examples where a general strategy succeeded, except possibly Wikipedia. And maybe Google, if you consider searching the Web an example of a UGC  business (since you are working off UGC in the broadest sense: all the Web's content). For a niche strategy, you definitely want a "breadth on top of depth" strategy, because if you are not careful, doubling down on an initially successful vertical can trap you in a cul-de-sac. False-alarm product-market fit. Friendfeed is an example of getting trapped in the best known cul-de-sac: early adopters. But on the other hand, this whole scheme is deceptive, because you can't really know upfront which particular niche will work for you. Heck, you don't even know which particular slicing/dicing of the potential market will yield your specific segment. That's why hunting for product-market fit is hard. It's not as simple as listing a bunch of hypothetical verticals and testing each in turn. Your factorization may be wrong. For http://trailmeme.com )the product I manage for Xerox) the early signs indicate that education is potentially the right first vertical, and I am dealing currently with figure out what to do with this insight. It isn't easy. Maybe it isn't 'education' that is the correct label for what we're seeing, but something else. Moore's bowling pin strategy that the mentions is not so much a normative strategy as a phenomenological phase that you can't control (Moore actually calls it 'Bowling Alley' ... one pin after another falling). So the answer is "niche" but that's a completely useless answer, because the REAL question is "which niche, and how do I double down on it?"

Venkatesh Rao

Depends on how much money you have. Rolling out a global marketing strategy requires a LOT of money and resources. Most startups don't have millions in the bank starting out. Therefore it makes a lot more sense to pick the low hanging fruit and focus on an easily-reached niche first.

Ryan Wardell

Just Added Q & A:

Find solution

For every problem there is a solution! Proved by Solucija.

  • Got an issue and looking for advice?

  • Ask Solucija to search every corner of the Web for help.

  • Get workable solutions and helpful tips in a moment.

Just ask Solucija about an issue you face and immediately get a list of ready solutions, answers and tips from other Internet users. We always provide the most suitable and complete answer to your question at the top, along with a few good alternatives below.