Why is Literature so important to the English curriculum?

Should poetry and literature be replaced in the English curriculum by more modern forms of media?

  • Given that people mostly read the internet these days, and form their opinions about things from newspaper articles and TV news headlines, should we be teaching people how to read and interpret these media? Could this completely replace the analysis of poetry and classical literature?

  • Answer:

    Whether it's poetry, literature, YouTube, reddit, or any other information medium, we must remember that the most important thing is to learn how to think critically. Most English curricula encompass more than just simply evaluating and understanding classical works of literature and poetry. It taught us to assess the author's intention and greater meaning. Even though we don't actively realize it, we are constantly applying this inductive form of comprehension to other forms of media, such as online news, Internet memes, et al. Now, to understand these other mediums requires a different lens that we may not traditionally use when, for example, we try to understand Shakespeare's Hamlet. But the same reasoning skills we developed in order to read between the lines can be just as applicable to wading through potential journalistic biases that exist in media headlines and content therein. As we rapidly start to digitize nearly every aspect of our life, we should learn how to take previous English skills that were taught to us and learn how to think critically in order to mold those tools into more relevant forms for emerging forms of media. A fine balance of both should be sought after, with neither's advantages being discounted.

Irving Ruan at Quora Visit the source

Was this solution helpful to you?

Other answers

Depends what you mean by English curriculum. I was taught English as a foreign language and the teaching did not rely on poetry in the slightest up to and including high school, though it might do so if you carry on studying it in university. English as a foreign language was taught by developing skills in different contexts, much like describe. Like 'asking for directions', 'following printed instructions', 'answer questions about a dialogue you just read' all interspersed with nuggets about anglo-american culture.   No amount of Shakespeare was necessary, which is of course not part of the curriculum outside anglo-american countries.

Anonymous

Like tweets you mean? I doubt. Back in school, we already were encouraged to watch some National Geographic to improve our listening skills. It would be interesting to blog your English homework but your homework would still be on Shakespeare and that is the way it should be.

Prateek Nigam

Related Q & A:

Just Added Q & A:

Find solution

For every problem there is a solution! Proved by Solucija.

  • Got an issue and looking for advice?

  • Ask Solucija to search every corner of the Web for help.

  • Get workable solutions and helpful tips in a moment.

Just ask Solucija about an issue you face and immediately get a list of ready solutions, answers and tips from other Internet users. We always provide the most suitable and complete answer to your question at the top, along with a few good alternatives below.