What's the obesity rates of certain countries in the world?

If the western world's obesity rates were lower, how much less money a year would these countries spend on food?

  • Less than 5% as opposed to 20%+. Could this saved money then be used in better ways?

  • Answer:

    I don't think food-related expenditure would go down. One of the principal causes of obesity appears to be low-cost, low-quality, high-sugar, high-fat foodstuffs. So, to reduce the rate of obesity, you'd have to spend more money on less quantity to ensure people eat more fresh food, fish, veg, fruit, lean meat, etc. So the food budget may actually go up, hopefully to be compensated for by a reduction in healthcare costs incurred for treatment of illness caused in whole or in part by obesity.

Bruce Bracken at Quora Visit the source

Was this solution helpful to you?

Other answers

They would probably save a lot more on medical expenses than on food since a lot of obesity results from the consumption of cheap food whereas the medical expense for dealing for diabetes and related illnesses is enormous.   The money could be spent for nutrional education and for other social programs that would contribute the quality of life of all citizens ... if the political process were geared towards motivating legislators to satisfy citizens rather than campaign contributors.

Joel V Benjamin

They might actually spend more money to get to less than 5% obesity. Good, wholesome, organic, fresh food isn't usually cheap. Grass fed beef and free range chickens, eggs from free range chickens cost more. There are OBVIOUS connections between obesity and a salty fatty delicious big mac and tasty fries with a super sized soft drink.   The diet that makes people fat is less expensive and more widely available. See your nearest fast food joint. versus Guess which probably cost more?

John Tracy

Probably quite a bit, and if obesity went down so would health care expenditures.

Charles Bollmann

Classic case of wrongful Public Policy. Politicians are only motivated to plan for only a couple of mandates into the future (never liable for what happens decades after). This often results in solutions optimized solely for the short-term - at the expense of sustainable, sensible long-term policies. Policies that do not combat (and indeed encourage) high on fat, salt and sugar foodstuffs, are popular until the onset of lifestyle diseases much later on (decades after the fact). In the mean time, the apparent abundance of  accessible (cheaper) and tasty foodstuffs pleases the populace (false wealth feeling). Deregulation (for producers and middlemen) also give a (temporary) boost to the produce and food processing economic sectors. Even not considering how competitive your exports become. Hence the special interest pressure groups. Public health policies configured to control obesity and incentive correct eating and exercise habits, only became obviously important to a society when it becomes easily demonstrable the personal and societal costs (aggregate health care costs, worker overall productivity, etc.) of not going down that path - now - with the current generation.

Nuno E. F. Silva

Related Q & A:

Just Added Q & A:

Find solution

For every problem there is a solution! Proved by Solucija.

  • Got an issue and looking for advice?

  • Ask Solucija to search every corner of the Web for help.

  • Get workable solutions and helpful tips in a moment.

Just ask Solucija about an issue you face and immediately get a list of ready solutions, answers and tips from other Internet users. We always provide the most suitable and complete answer to your question at the top, along with a few good alternatives below.