With English being the preferred language for communication in professional, social and personal, how important is it know other native languages?
-
How can we ensure the survival and growth of our languages if we prefer to speak and teach only English with our kids? I ask this question because I see these days most people prefer to converse in English even though they have the same mother tongue or know other local languages like Hindi, Tamil, Bengali. In cities at least, English has become the preferred language in most spheres of our life, be it the district collector or the vegetable vendor selling in a push cart. Now my question is by conversing in one language only, are we not creating a generation who would not be able to appreciate India's diversity and enjoy spoken/ written art in other languages? Sometimes it is difficult to express our feelings everything in English because we cannot get the nuances correct in English. This directly affects the quality of the conversation and we may not get full satisfaction out of it. Let me take the example of a child whose both parents don't have the same mother tongue and talk only in English. A child growing up in such a house may not learn either of his parents languages and end up talking only in English. If the same child goes to a English medium school where they do not teach any other language, the child will end up speaking only one language. Will this child not miss out on one of the most common gift an Indian enjoys of being multi-lingual? In a second scenario, this same child may pick both his parent's mother tongue and pick up an additional language spoken in the locality. This child will end up speaking four languages and thus enjoy music/ movies in four different languages. If he learns how to how to read/ write English, he will enjoy the languages even more and some day contribute in its literature and thus ensure the survival of the language. Please don't mistake me to be a hater of English because I love it and can express myself best in it. I just love different languages and am fortunate enough to understand five languages and enjoy music and movies in all of them. The pleasure I get from knowing these languages makes me wonder about the fun missed by those who speak one or two languages only. I would like to ensure languages are protected and encouraged to grow so that we enjoy their songs, poetry and stories. I am asking this question with reference to English in India, but I feel the same can be applied to other languages in different regions as well. So please feel free to give your views.
-
Answer:
I am a born and bred English speaker, and I take great delight in the language and its amazing diversity of words and huge strengths. On behalf of the English language, I apologise to non-native English speakers who have had to learn such a complex tongue. My journey has been remarkable: it started in a world where French was the intertnational language of diplomacy and had to be learned. If one wanted to get into university, one had to have Latin at âOâ level. And for science, an understanding of German was important. No doubt, those wishing to pursue a career as an opera singer would need to learn Italian, but that was not on my life plan. Now that my journey is in its later stages, I have come to live in the Lao Peopleâs Democratic Republic. When I arrived here, I started to learn the language - hugely difficult for many Europeans because it is tonal and a word expressed in the wrong tone can mean something comprehensively different to the meaning one intends - and sometimes something hugely embarrassing! I soon found out that it was necessary only to have sufficient grasp of the language to get by in the market or whilst travelling. A rapidly growing population of the Lao spoke English to a much higher level of command than I could every hope to gain in Lao. And, in Laos, there are 49 officially recoginsed ethnic groups, which share between them some 85 officially recognised languages. Not bad for a country with a population of less than seven million. The official policy is that all education is conducted in the Lao language, which disadvantages a huge number of children whose mother tongue is not Lao. I asked a friend of mine, who is expert in the ethnic groups of Laos, whether there was a danger of the minority languages dying out and he affirmed it. Should we not be collecting a complete record of all of the languages, now? I asked. Why? he replied. What would be the point? Most of them do not have a written form. He told me of the improbable number of world languages and the number that die out every year. How would we collect them? What would we do with them? And, especially, what would we do with the collections when nobody can speak or understand many of those languages any more. On the other hand, my wife, who is Lao, was set a project once to write an essay on the advantages of a multi-lingual society - in the Lao sense of having many languages. We discussed the topic and she was greatly in favour of numerous languages. We discussed the basis of inter-human understanding, and its dependence on being able to converse in a common language. The more people that can talk together in a tongue that all comprehend, the greater the prospects for understanding. The ultimate in misunderstanding would be a population is which everyone spoke a different language and nobody could understand what anyone else was saying. They say that, if you cannot read such classics as the Rubaiyat in its original tongue, you miss important parts of its meaning - even though the FitzGerald translation is one of the most beautiful pieces of our language! On the other hand, English is one of the most dynamic languages and it is continually adopting and adapting from other languages. If there is not a word that does the job, then English steals one from elsewhere, and this is one of the things that gives it its great strength. It is organic and vigorous. Quite how the process works I am not sure - I have a friend in Manila who wants the word âheartualâ to be introduced, to match intellectual, spiritual, visceral, etc. I am working hard on her behalf! (Please note!) Because of the organic nature of language, I donât think that there is any real answer to this question. What is happening is happening. What will happen, will happen (even if that means that some version of Chinese becomes the future world language) and one cannot legislate on the matter, Canute-like. The French have adopted a system of âDaddy knows bestâ and try hard to keep their language âpureâ, which means disallowing any imports: thus one gets the official courrier electronique or message electonique in place of the simple email. But, until 1984 finally arrives, language is one of the most democratic institutions in the world, bowing to popular usage, even in France.
Mike Boddington at Quora Visit the source
Other answers
I feel for you mate. Sidelining our own language(s) for a foreign one is one of the major cons of developing India. English has become more of a status symbol and is also most time considered as a proof for someone being well educated. No doubt this one language has helped us survive in almost any part of the world, as ⦠has already mentioned. In a country like ours with a population of over 1.2 Billion and more than 780 languages we do need a common tongue. English has provided as an effective alternative throughout the recent decades, has become the language of the most affluent and thus necessary. Even some national institutes like IIT and AIIMS won't accept your papers in Hindi or any other language. Its just the way its happening. But now lets come to the main topic. The main reason why English became the universal language was not its dynamic nature, but the aggressive nature of the English empire. Every language is equally dynamic. They all evolve with time, exchange vocabulary with languages they come in contact with, different dialects are added when it moves to distant regions. English was the language of our rulers for over about two centuries so it had to be renowned as a regal language in our country, hence people's favorite too (at least some who also happened to be with a great following). Same was the case with many other English colonies, So does English deserves to be a universal language, absolutely, it is only practical. Or would you rather have the whole world discuss to chose and then learn a completely different language, cause believe me, that discussion will also happen in English only. If some people consider it a damage, then they need to live with it, as its already done. English at the domestic level is a completely different game. Those who claim that English was a boon to our country as now we can migrate to almost any part of the world do not consider the consequences. English is NOT the common language of people of India.(Try buying some stuff from a local street vendor any where in India) Only a certain segment of people can commute in it efficiently enough to actually add in the development of our country or sciences and technologies globally.Others who can speak English are doing what has already been mentioned, surviving, even in their own country. By sidelining our Domestic languages we are also sidelining the potential of all those other people who do not or can not speak in English. Those who like to quote the examples of our achievements due to our competency in English will never understand why countries like Japan, Germany, Russia, China and many other are, where they are even though English is not as revered as their local languages. Their inventions, their education and even their official work does not requires their nationals to learn a language other than their own(exception being their foreign departments), hence giving each and every individual from every segment of their population to be able to contribute something of value to their country. The icing on the top is that in our country that English is the fashionable language. A part of our population is even tending to make it their only spoken language, by speaking at home, with their family members, their children especially outside in the public. Most literature today in our country is published originally in English(not that all the work is original) and then if in high demand may be translated in regional languages. This complete scenario is quite unsettling. English is undoubtedly the best option right now as the International language, but at a domestic level, we should really support and encourage our regional languages or we would end up alienating our languages, our culture and most importantly, our own people. That is my opinion at least.
Anurag Srivastava
Hello Mike, Thanks for expressing your beautiful insight on languages. We, the non-native English speakers, are actually thankful to the English for giving us this universal language with all its richness because it has made us capable of surviving in any corner of the world. The reason English has spread to all over the globe is because of its dynamic nature, like you said. It has been kind enough to accept words from other languages and in turn gifted with universal acceptance. For a country like India with about thirty official languages and over 700 dialects, English is the one of few languages that is understood and accepted by majority of the population. English has been the bridge that removed the communication gap and helped us in sharing our thoughts all over the country. As your friend said that languages die because of their non-usage and nothing much can be done about it. I am only concerned with the fact that with the death of a language we also lose ways of expressing ourselves differently and beautifully. Again the main purpose of language is communication and if a few languages is able to achieve it, it will have its own benefits and people will learn to live with it. So like you said , "What is happening is happening. What will happen, will happen,.." and there is no point in worrying about it. Meanwhile, those who want to understand a different cultures better they can pick up local languages and enjoy their beauty in their true sense.
Raju Dey
Related Q & A:
- How can I sort strings in multiple languages?Best solution by Stack Overflow
- Is English really a difficult language for autistic to master?Best solution by answers.yahoo.com
- How important is a certificate to work as a paralegal?Best solution by answers.yahoo.com
- If I major in sociology can I go to graduate school for a masters in social work and how long will it take?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
- Is it important (and how important is it) to get a warranty on a plasma tv?Best solution by cnet.com
Just Added Q & A:
- How many active mobile subscribers are there in China?Best solution by Quora
- How to find the right vacation?Best solution by bookit.com
- How To Make Your Own Primer?Best solution by thekrazycouponlady.com
- How do you get the domain & range?Best solution by ChaCha
- How do you open pop up blockers?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
For every problem there is a solution! Proved by Solucija.
-
Got an issue and looking for advice?
-
Ask Solucija to search every corner of the Web for help.
-
Get workable solutions and helpful tips in a moment.
Just ask Solucija about an issue you face and immediately get a list of ready solutions, answers and tips from other Internet users. We always provide the most suitable and complete answer to your question at the top, along with a few good alternatives below.