What exactly is the super-string theory?

Is it true that a computer code behaviour is found in superstring theory?

• Can some one explain the math/science behind it? Dr. S. James Gates, Jr., a theoretical physicist, the John S. Toll Professor of Physics at the University of Maryland, and the Director of The Center for String & Particle Theory, is reporting that certain string theory, super-symmetrical  equations, which describe the fundamental nature of the Universe and reality, contain embedded computer codes. These codes are digital data in the form of 1′s and 0′s. Not only that, these codes are the same as what make web browsers work and are error-correction codes! Gates says, “We have no idea what these ‘things’ are doing there”.

• Answer:

  String theory is not science because it fails to provide any testable hypothesis.  Maybe it will produce one someday, I sure would like to hear about one. However, back to the question, I see the double slit experiment and the duality of velocity and time travel with spacetime as an example of how the universe is made of code.  The photons have to go through both slits, neither, just the one, and just the other before choosing one.  If I were to design a physics engine, the data acquisition phase occurs before the processing phase which happens before the execution and commuting phase.  When you go fast(do a lot of shifts per second), time slows down for you, according to the equations of spacetime.  If you are going to use up your CPU on one thing, you have less cpu available for another thing and it approaches zero. So it would mean matter either has properties that run this procedure which uses up the cpu, or matter is instances of objects where an external process is being applied to them and are being throttled so that one process doesn't bog down the entire universe.  A testable hypothesis to try to narrow this question would be to do the double slit experiment in a device that is approaching the speed of light and see if the photons exhibit some lag while deciding what options it has, and where it should go. I believe we are in a computer.  All we need is to understand the source and then we will be pissing off the thing that built it by fiddling with it in potentially damaging ways.