Is there something wrong with friendster?

Did Friendster fail purely because of technology? Or something else?

  • According to this post: , Friendster failed because of technology. But it seems like Facebook has gotten so much more traction and "sticky" traction among "true friends".

  • Answer:

    In my opinion, Friendster lost the social networking battle because it lacked in these key areas: technology, user-experience, and platform. a. Technology - Friendster was commonly hampered by its success. Servers would slow down immensely because of database issues or even coding that wasn't optimized. Users got frustrated from total site shutdowns, or by its utter slowness to even allow users to login. b. User-Experience - Facebook is designed very well. And it appealed to a more mature crowd that didn't like the content clutter of MySpace, or the navigability of Friendster. Also, AJAX was heavily used so content loaded dynamicly without having the page fully reload (like friendster). Facebook was a better product in every way - sharing, photos, profile, app content, privacy, etc. A simple thing like 'poke' caught on immensely. c. Platform - Facebook allowed developers to create content on their platform and leverage the social network. This platform spawned a whole generation of social-apps ranging from personality quizzes, games, and vampire bites. This kept the network interesting, and people stayed on it longer.

Nicholas Chhan at Quora Visit the source

Was this solution helpful to you?

Other answers

Friendster had terrible community management and made serveral missteps to alienate its early adopters.  It was conceived as a dating site but early users created a thriving community of "concept" profiles (historical figures, cities, venues, cultural works) so that users could "friend" these to show different group affiliations.  This created a culture that was very sophisticated and engaged, but didn't fit the founder's vision / business model so one day the "fake" profiles were all arbitrarily deleted (apparently Johnathan Abrams took special pleasure in personally deleting profiles that people made for their pets), which alienated a huge number of users (I was one of them).  Around that time myspace was picking up and everybody bailed, but people weren't happy about the decision.  Server issues were also a problem, but the core community was loyal and sites that own up to their service issues can often still succeed if they have loyal users (like Makeoutclub, which broke down more often than a punk's tour van but had fiercely loyal users). Friendster never recovered the loss of early adopters to myspace, except for maybe a brief renaissance in 2007.  Meanwhile the site became hugely popular among teens in Southeast Asia and eventually, after several product development death spirals, management made a site for the users they had, and dropped profiles altogether to make it a social gaming site for Asian tweens.  it was weird to go on that site in 2010 and see all of the frozen in time  2003 American hipsters stuck in this branding and graphic design for 12yearold gamers.

Tom Gillis

It's simple, and I know this because my Country, Indonesia was one of the biggest in Friendster.  And now we are number 3 in Facebook :) Friendster failed because simply nobody goes there anymore. This kind of places, just like its real-life counterpart (joints,pubs,market,restaurant, etc), depends on customers.  No customers, no hits, no advertiser, no money. Having said that, maybe Friendster could've reinvented itself, or innovate, trying to differentiate itself against Facebook, like what MySpace is trying to do.

Chris Prakoso

Just Added Q & A:

Find solution

For every problem there is a solution! Proved by Solucija.

  • Got an issue and looking for advice?

  • Ask Solucija to search every corner of the Web for help.

  • Get workable solutions and helpful tips in a moment.

Just ask Solucija about an issue you face and immediately get a list of ready solutions, answers and tips from other Internet users. We always provide the most suitable and complete answer to your question at the top, along with a few good alternatives below.