How has the American agriculture changed during this last century?

How has American culture's notion of "race" changed in the last century or two?

  • Many historians and anthropologists have observed that "race" is a social construct, a way of mentally organizing the many different types of humans into buckets, and does not seem to really correspond to any relevant biological differences.  In American culture in 2014, most Americans would probably say there are several major racial categories: black, white, Asian -- and then it becomes a little less clear how people conceive of South Asians, Latinos, people from the Middle East --- people disagree somewhat on whether these are racial groups, ethnic groups or something else.  For example, a Persian-Iranian-American friend of mine explained that Americans are sometimes unsure whether they view Persians as "white" or "Middle Eastern" or even "Asian." And even these categories were not necessarily in place in people's minds until recently.  For example, in the late 1800s, some Americans felt that Irish and Italians were not "white" although everybody today would call these people white. In general, how has the current view of "race" developed?

  • Answer:

    The distinctive US feature starting with the Jim Crow era is the one-drop rule lumping mulatto and other mixed-race castes with blacks. In many New World societies they had been a category of their own, including in Louisiana and I think even Charleston. "White" has always been ambiguous with respect to groups not yet established in large numbers. In the slavery era, the main concern (besides Indians) was slaves and those related to slaves, vs. other free population, leaving the latter sharing legal status with whites. The US Census has always counted Middle Easterners as white, counted Mexicans as white because of their equality under the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo except for the 1930 census until the recent shift to self-reporting of race, and was ambiguous on South Asians until categorizing them as Asians largely on their West Coast economic role similar to East Asians.

Joseph Boyle at Quora Visit the source

Was this solution helpful to you?

Other answers

From the middle to the end of 1800 we had the spread of Charles Darwing ideas of natural selection, so people where full of ideas of what would be more fit to the evolution of mankind, that lead to lots of different ideas of races and lots of bizarre statistics over that. It was pretty common the idea of comparisons over differences in order to justify success and failure rates. Nowadays this is just forbiden as we are under the ideals if egalitarianism so everyone is considered equals and we should pursue to minimize the most any possible consideration of difference about individuals. It is our own way to assure everyone should get the same results.

Glauco Becaro

Just Added Q & A:

Find solution

For every problem there is a solution! Proved by Solucija.

  • Got an issue and looking for advice?

  • Ask Solucija to search every corner of the Web for help.

  • Get workable solutions and helpful tips in a moment.

Just ask Solucija about an issue you face and immediately get a list of ready solutions, answers and tips from other Internet users. We always provide the most suitable and complete answer to your question at the top, along with a few good alternatives below.