What is the best content spinner?

Does a rel=canonical link remove all SEO value from the page linking back to the original content?

  • I have a website for a local company that publishes quality content to an on-site blog. We're expanding to a new geographic region, and I'm in the process of building another website targeting the new region. I'd like to include a blog section on the new website, which will pull in any content/posts from our existing blog. I primarily want to do this for the added SEO benefit of having fresh, relevant content that's frequently updated on your website. However, I would of course need to add a rel=canonical link back to the original blog in order to ensure I don't get any duplicate content penalties from posting the same content across two separate domains. My question is whether adding that rel=canonical link will eliminate the SEO value of that content being posted to the new website? I'm not really talking about which blog post would show up in SERPs, as I understand that the point of the rel=canonical tag is to provide attribution to the primary source of the content. I'm more concerned about whether using a rel=canonical on the content would eliminate the secondary SEO benefit of having relevant, frequently updated content on your website, due to Google being essentially "blind" to the duplicate content.

  • Answer:

    I wouldn't advise you to create a blog on a new site and copy the content from another site - even if you do use rel=canonical. The rel=canonical isn't really designed for this, although it has been proven to work cross-domain as your talking about. Doing it occasionally would be fine and there are instances when I can see the benefit of doing so, but across hundreds or thousands of posts could look a bit strange and isn't really a long term content strategy you want to pursue. In short, Google almost certainly won't give you credit for having fresh content if your just copy it and use the rel=canonical on every post. Also, all the link juice you gain from the blog content will go to the old site anyway and leave your new site thirsty :) Perhaps just do it occasionally when you have a great post you want to promote in two places, and try to publish some unique content on the new site that isn't available anywhere else.

James Blackwell at Quora Visit the source

Was this solution helpful to you?

Other answers

What you're proposing is risky because if the two pages are not almost identical, Google might reject the canonical and index both which would cause harmful cross domain duplicate content. It seems that the threshold for a canonical to be accepted has changed as of late and I am seeing cases of two very similar pages on some websites (similar page on root and subdomain) using the same canonical both being indexed. In addition, Bing is not yet following the canonical suggestion and any SEO benefit would be negligible if any. Side note, doing separate websites for different geographic regions is a high effort proposition. In general, I would always suggest building a single branded website in which I would silo content dedicated to different regions.

Rick Bucich

Just Added Q & A:

Find solution

For every problem there is a solution! Proved by Solucija.

  • Got an issue and looking for advice?

  • Ask Solucija to search every corner of the Web for help.

  • Get workable solutions and helpful tips in a moment.

Just ask Solucija about an issue you face and immediately get a list of ready solutions, answers and tips from other Internet users. We always provide the most suitable and complete answer to your question at the top, along with a few good alternatives below.