Can qwiki uphold their pending patent?
-
Qwiki filed a pretty generic patent application about getting data from websites and generating an animation. Does this mean that nobody else can do this type of thing for a different application? ie. Animations based on Data/Reviews from Yelp or data pulled from your social networks for your own animated slideshow, etc? http://Animoto.com already connects to facebook to download content and creates an amazing slideshow with music or narration. They also have a patent pending for "cinematic AI". Also, http://slide.com has been putting together animations from multiple web sources into various animation templates for years... nothing new or non-obvious here. Wouldn't this prior art render qwiki's patent (if it was approved) indefensible? http://www.google.com/patents?id=IBvhAQAAEBAJ&zoom=4&dq=qwiki&pg=PA1#v=onepage&q=qwiki&f=false
-
Answer:
The problem is that to answer your questions, one would need to go to court, and it is likely that we're talking about over half a million dollars to resolve whatever questions would come up in a single case if both parties are entrenched. The better question in each case is which party or parties would survive summary judgment in such a case. Prior art arguments aren't going to end a case before fact-finding, so you're either faced with invalidating the patent by petitioning the USPTO (highly unlikely) or needing to fight the whole case. The pragmatic answer to your question is that if Qwiki and Animoto get their patents, they will likely be able to extract money from others who are arguably in their respective spaces.
Joe Emison at Quora Visit the source
Other answers
First of all, it is unknown whether Qwiki will ever get a patent, or if they get one, it will have the same broad claims as those listed now. If one believse there is prior art; prior to Oct. 20, 2009, the USPTO does provide mechanisms to protest an application. See http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/documents/1900_1901.htm#sect1901
Konstantinos Konstantinides
That's the problem with system patents - they're so specific that one little change and the previous one doesn't apply. I've been working on something that renders automatic animations since last year... similar end result .. pretty different 'system' to get there.
Rob Platek
Related Q & A:
- Can you patent something illegal?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
- What does it mean when a patent fee status has lapsed?Best solution by info.legalzoom.com
- How can I cancel pending transaction on my debit card?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
- How can you get a patent?Best solution by wiki.answers.com
- Is it possible to cancel a pending transaction?Best solution by ChaCha
Just Added Q & A:
- How many active mobile subscribers are there in China?Best solution by Quora
- How to find the right vacation?Best solution by bookit.com
- How To Make Your Own Primer?Best solution by thekrazycouponlady.com
- How do you get the domain & range?Best solution by ChaCha
- How do you open pop up blockers?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
For every problem there is a solution! Proved by Solucija.
-
Got an issue and looking for advice?
-
Ask Solucija to search every corner of the Web for help.
-
Get workable solutions and helpful tips in a moment.
Just ask Solucija about an issue you face and immediately get a list of ready solutions, answers and tips from other Internet users. We always provide the most suitable and complete answer to your question at the top, along with a few good alternatives below.