Why don't companies selling solar energy utilization solutions use electrolysis of the water for energy accumulation?
-
That should be much cheaper and more "green" than using traditional lithium accumulators. With electrolysis it is possible to save almost unlimited amounts of energy.
-
Answer:
Here are a few technical challenges. Not necessarily insurmountable, but difficult enough that we don't have cheap enough options yet. Hydrogen doesn't store well. Most materials will get http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrogen_damage when storing the stuff. You'd have to replace the canisters pretty often. Steel (the usual material for gas canisters) is subject to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrogen_embrittlement. from http://sirius.mtm.kuleuven.be/Research/corr-o-scope/hcindex2/tutor2.htm Hydrogen also doesn't give you very good energy density, even when compared to batteries, when you consider the conversion efficiency -- the fact that while the hydrogen technically has more energy, you can't come anywhere close to converting 100% of it back to electricity. See: http://stormthecastles.blogspot.com/2009/02/hydrogen-vs-batteries.html This is considering efficiency all around -- energy in vs hydrogen out, then hydrogen in vs electricity out. Hydrogen looks a little better if you consider only hydrogen in vs electricity out, and a lot better if you consider only the energy available in hydrogen without considering what it takes to generate and store the gas and then convert it back to electricity.
Jacob VanWagoner at Quora Visit the source
Other answers
Audi is working on a project that uses renewable electricity--from wind in this case, instead of solar--for electrolysis to make hydrogen, but that's just the first half of the story: http://www.audi.com/com/brand/en/vorsprung_durch_technik/content/2013/10/energy-turnaround-in-the-tank.html
Jeffrey Phillips
Electrolysis is a very inefficient way to store energy. It's typically like 10%. So a 15% efficient solar panel becomes a 1.5% efficient energy storage device. And even that amount of energy is almost useless, there isn't a lot of use for no pressure gaseous Hydrogen, other than blowing up or corroding your pipes and tanks.
George Gonzalez
Electrolysis will eventually be used at some point but it is inefficient and produces difficult to store hydrogen gas.
Malcolm Sargeant
I believe you're right. Energy storage and distribution is the issue. Hydrogen isn't the answer for the reasons given above. The ability to extract carbon from the atmosphere would be a heady step forward.
Michael Grainger
Related Q & A:
- Why don't I get the little envelope in my taskbar in Outlook Express when I get a message?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
- Why don't people care about the earth?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
- Why don't I have an information bar?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
- Why don't I get the pictures with some emails?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
- Why don't we use E-Prime more?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
Just Added Q & A:
- How many active mobile subscribers are there in China?Best solution by Quora
- How to find the right vacation?Best solution by bookit.com
- How To Make Your Own Primer?Best solution by thekrazycouponlady.com
- How do you get the domain & range?Best solution by ChaCha
- How do you open pop up blockers?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
For every problem there is a solution! Proved by Solucija.
-
Got an issue and looking for advice?
-
Ask Solucija to search every corner of the Web for help.
-
Get workable solutions and helpful tips in a moment.
Just ask Solucija about an issue you face and immediately get a list of ready solutions, answers and tips from other Internet users. We always provide the most suitable and complete answer to your question at the top, along with a few good alternatives below.