Comparative Economy of India?

If a certain person goes from India to US, earns billions of dollars there, and brings the money back to India then is he contributing to the improvement of the economy of India (doesn't matter if the contribution is negligible)?

  • I basically read somewhere that money is just a system designed by humans to avoid barter system. The amount of money any country has is equal to the value of its resources. (Correct me if I am wrong). So if someone earns money from US and brings to India, is he adding resources to India? If somehow thousands of Indians bring billions of dollars to India will it improve the value of Rupee compared to Dollar?

  • Answer:

    Let us start from your explanation to the question. Your understanding about money is correct. Money is but a medium of exchange. Your doubt about your second statement is also correct. Amount of money any country has is not equal to the value of its resources. Money is but one of the resource. others are men, materials and entrepreneurial skills. Resources are capacities. Young Indians is a resource. But if they remain unemployed, the same youngsters become liabilities to the economy. Same is with your dollars. If not appropriately invested in productive activities become a liability as interest is to be paid on that if kept in bank. If simply spent, it will add to inflation. More money chasing the same quantities of goods and services.   So the answer to your first question is ' it depends on how it is spent.' The answer to your second question is ' yes so far as Indian imports are more than her exports rupee will strengthen against dollar by such remittances.' I hope this has helped you in your quest.

Vishwas Londhe at Quora Visit the source

Was this solution helpful to you?

Other answers

Yes he certainly is, but he can very well contribute the same while earning in India, it depends on the type of work you are doing and what does it fetch in the global market. Guess Kumar (An educated person), goes and works in USA for 10 years  accumulating a wealth of 1 million dollars. These one million dollars are the promise of American Monetary system of paying back Kumar by equal amount in goods and services. During his stay in America Kumar must have added more than 1 million dollars as goods or services to American economy, say $2M, unless he was involved in some illegal activity. So once he comes back to India he is only bringing with him $1M, while he could have contributed far greater to Indian economy had he worked with an equal number of opportunities and resources. So it depends upon what an individual can contribute to an economy, home or abroad. If the total benefit that is carried back home ($1M) is greater than the total benefit that could be made by staying at home, It is very well worth it to work abroad, more so if you are unemployed/underemployed in India. But if the contribution carried back home is insignificant in comparison to the benefit that could be generated by staying at home, better stay home.

Vipul Gupta

This is what precisely is happening now. India is the largest recipient of expatriates remittances of about $80 b per annum. This to some extent bridges the gap between exports and imports. That is whyNRIs are wooed by the government.  Whenever Indian rupee depreciates one of the first things done by RBI is to increase the rate of interest forNRIs for their FCNR deposits.

Ramamurthy Guruvayurappan

Since you can't use dollars in India, you'll have to convert it to Rupee. When you sell your dollars to a bank it will be added to RBIs foreign reserves. So yes, he would be contributing to the economy and helping Rupee gain against dollar. But this is totally theoretical. Bringing in billions, or even millions for that matter, is no joke. LN Mittal made a fortune and he did his college in India. So he is setting up a steel plant in India. That's FDI. That's the way money comes in in real life. But it's a two way process. Foreigners will also come to India, set up their businesses and walk away with the money. For a country to prosper, what it really needs is to increase its own productivity. Industrial outputs, manufacturing, agriculture all need to be increased domestically to become competitive at the global level.

Gourav Kumar

Related Q & A:

Just Added Q & A:

Find solution

For every problem there is a solution! Proved by Solucija.

  • Got an issue and looking for advice?

  • Ask Solucija to search every corner of the Web for help.

  • Get workable solutions and helpful tips in a moment.

Just ask Solucija about an issue you face and immediately get a list of ready solutions, answers and tips from other Internet users. We always provide the most suitable and complete answer to your question at the top, along with a few good alternatives below.