Can I have a job description for officers like in Law and Order?

Ferguson Grand Jury Decision (November 2014): Are white police officers more likely to let black robbery suspects get away after the Michael Brown incident, to avoid legal hassles?

• Why take the risk of being termed a racist and have legal proceeding that result in losing job when the officer can just look the other way if the robbery suspect is black? How would that impact the law and order situation?

• Answer:

  Quite the opposite. If anything, the indication is that there is significant overenforcement, not underenforcement, against black suspects in the US. But regardless of that, officers are not going to just let a violent felony like a robbery go. You might get off with a warning for speeding or jaywalking, or they might let someone speeding 6 over pass by without stopping if people routinely go 20 over through that section. But that's not true for crimes like robbery. In the vast majority of cases, the suspect can be apprehended rather than killed. Doing that, rather than ignoring crimes, is the solution. Brown was unarmed, and even if the officer was ultimately forced into a position where he had to fire, he should've had more backup on scene if he suspected he was apprehending a felon, and certainly should not have let him come right up to the car and assault him from a superior position. Even if we assume Wilson's version was absolutely true, he really screwed up and contributed a great deal toward the situation escalating.