Best way to communicate with new client as a freelance graphic designer?

What is the best way to proceed when you receive a settlement action letter from Getty images?

  • First off, let me say, I am a designer and I ALWAYS license my images. I have spent tens of thousands of dollars on behalf of my clients to license stock photos. A client of mine had a comping image located in a non-public area of her website. It was used internally and was ultimately rejected and not used on the website. Its not indexed in any search engines including google search. She received the following letter: Please be advised that NCS has been retained by Getty Images with regard to the settlement of an image infringement claim in the above referenced matter. In that regard, we have been assigned this file, and have attached hereto copies of the letter previously sent by our client together with copies of the unauthorized images and the capture of said images on your website. Our client has attempted to resolve this claim by communicating with your company directly, but has been unable to do so. Our goal is to resolve this claim on an amicable basis, without having to resort to further action in this regard. We do have some flexibility with the amount claimed if this is resolved immediately. Alternatively, if we cannot settle this imminently, we would be obligated to refer the file back to our client for further action including the potential initiation of suit.  It would be preferable to settle this matter upon terms agreeable to both parties, and to avoid the time and expense of potential protracted litigation. We trust that we can resolve this amicably, and we look forward to hearing from in this regard upon receipt of this email.     Our client understands that a third-party designer, employee or intern may have been contracted to design and develop your company’s website. However, if no licenses for use of the images from our client exist, the liability of any infringement ultimately falls on the company displaying the imagery, which is considered the end user. If this situation applies to your company, please contact the third-party to inquire if there are any licenses from our client for the specific use of the images in question. If this is the case, please contact us as soon as possible to provide the invoice number or sales order number information and we will research accordingly. If a third party who supplied the images is willing to settle on your behalf, that third party may contact us to settle this matter. If the third party is unable or unwilling to settle on your behalf, we will continue to pursue your company as the end user of the image. Any pursuit by you of reimbursement from the third party would be between you and the third party, separate from our claim against you.   While we appreciate the removal of the represented images from your website, removal of the images alone does not settle the matter. Since your company has already infringed the copyright by using the image without a valid license, the photographers are entitled to compensation for the use of their work. Therefore, our client will continue to pursue settlement of the demand. We are seeking payment for the unlicensed use of the images.   This is an effort to effect a settlement and any information obtained will be used for that purpose.Sincerely,     NCS IP Solutions LLC PO Box 50276 Sarasota, FL 34232 T - http://tel:941-371-9900 F - http://tel:941-371-9901 _____________ Needless to say, my client was NOT contacted directly by Getty. We would have simply removed the image because we aren't using it for anything. What is the best way to proceed?

  • Answer:

    Don't reply, remove the images, sit still and cross your fingers. I just happen to know someone who has successfully used this strategy. Whatever you do - no excuses - if you see something is used that is not paid credit for, in whatever way, walk away from it.

Reinoud Schuijers at Quora Visit the source

Was this solution helpful to you?

Other answers

Answering: “What is the best way to proceed when you receive a settlement action letter from Getty images?”I am not a lawyer and what I’m about to write does not constitute legal advice. Anything stated as fact is actually just opinion.Before we begin, it’s important to always source images from reputable companies if you have something to lose (i.e. brand, reputation, money, house, self-respect, etc). If you’re from some remote village in some non-Western country or some other situation where the chances of you being identified and/or found are close to zero, then by all means use whatever images you like from a Google Images search or wherever you find them. It’s not legal and not cool, but you’re unlikely to suffer the fate discussed in this question.The first step is always to check the facts. Sometimes people have actually licensed the image correctly and Getty doesn’t know about it. Getty uses LOTS of distributors to license images on their behalf, so they don’t always know where their legitimate licenses end up. Other times they just get it wrong and they’re extorting you for usage of an image that’s public domain or available with a legitimate license from another source. I’ve seen both cases happen. So check the facts. Check your licenses and find other legitimate places where the image is available to see if sourced legally. If you know you lifted the image from another website (not a photo agency) or from Google Image search, then you can skip this step. Instead, use the time you saved to beat yourself up for what you did. Not cool, my friend. Not cool.Then, I recommend you immediately remove the images and wait. Most of the time this won’t work, but it’s worth a try. Expect them to send another letter - letters are cheap.Getty Images and other stock photo libraries make a lot of money from following up misuse and they’ve perfected the processes. They have found it’s more profitable to scare you into paying a fine that’s many times the value of the license you likely needed than to try to turn you into a happy customer. The letters are intentionally intimidating, and they’re more-often-than-not effective. So when you receive the second letter you have a couple of options: Make an offer, if paying the demanded amount would be a financial disaster for you. Aim for about 15% of what they’re demanding. They’re likely to accept this as it’s an easy and likely-still-profitable out (it’s only cost them a couple of letters so far). Pay it, if you think that they can see that you can afford it. Though if you can afford it, you’re very likely in a position to have known better, so take the hit and move on. If they think you can afford it, they’re more likely to follow through, which they often do. Call their bluff. Getty doesn’t want to take you to court because that reduces the likelihood of a successful outcome and decreases the profitability of this process. You can help your case by saying you now have a better understanding of image licensing and will be more careful in the future. This method obviously carries greater risks, so use it wisely. You can find other, probably better, opinions on how to handle these cases by Googling “Getty extortion letter”. Good luck, and next time, try to rise to the level of a legit online citizen. :)

Lee Torrens

Just Added Q & A:

Find solution

For every problem there is a solution! Proved by Solucija.

  • Got an issue and looking for advice?

  • Ask Solucija to search every corner of the Web for help.

  • Get workable solutions and helpful tips in a moment.

Just ask Solucija about an issue you face and immediately get a list of ready solutions, answers and tips from other Internet users. We always provide the most suitable and complete answer to your question at the top, along with a few good alternatives below.