How extensive are employment background checks?

How do I do background employment checks for new employees?

  • I just opened up a new   small business and I am planning to hire interns. so i want to know   about  employment background check for   employees. Thanks

  • Answer:

    I've used Background Verify multiple times and recommend it to companies and consumers. They provide national background checks and investigations are preformed by an established retired federal agent. You can check national criminal records, state criminal records, arrest warrants, sex offender search, evictions, and the list goes on! https://backgroundverify.com/

Paige Gruner at Quora Visit the source

Was this solution helpful to you?

Other answers

At our company http://www.homehero.org/ we use http://www.sterlinginfosystems.com/. - $18 per individual for National - $60 for National, County and Federal - $85 for National, County and Federal + More

Kyle Hill

For practical and legal reasons (if the background check is incorrect, a potential employee can file suit against you) it is always advisable to use a professional service to do your background screening.That way, you are protected in case errors cause you to deny someone employment. Contact several different background companies and have them explain their processes to you. Ask them for references and then check those references.Then have them test screen a few candidates for you and see if you satisfied with their services. If you are satisfied and the company does a good job, I would suggest that you make certain that all potential candidates both know that you are screening them and that they agree to be screened, Have them sign a form consenting to the background check and then perform the checks. If there are any discrepancies found, inform the candidate and ask them to explain. If they cannot or will not provide you with satisfactory answers, dismiss them from consideration. To save money and time, you may only wish to run background screens on people who you intend to hire. Running one on all candidates will be time consuming, wasteful and expensive.

Jon Mixon

If you are looking to hire candidates, I would use an external background screening provider to conduct the background check. This way, you can assure that the process is legally compliant. I would recommend looking at https://www.goodhire.com/?utm_source=quora&cam=7943 to run a background check. GoodHire was ranked thehttp://www.businessnewsdaily.com/7640-best-one-time-background-check-service.html because of the affordability, the ease of use, and the superior customer service support. It is very easy to run a background check with GoodHire. Purchase a report: you can choose from 3 available report packages and add any additional checks to the report Company verification: to ensure legal compliance, your company is vetted before candidate screening can begin Candidate verification & consent: we work directly with candidates to gather basic information and clear consent before screening Fast & comprehensive searches: results are typically returned within 1-3 business days

Max Wesman

Background checks are a contentious topic that raises questions that go to the heart of privacy, equal opportunity, and fair treatment. Some companies don’t do background checks, they do them wrong, or they overdo it. Usually that’s the source of the trouble, and the problem.If you’re using overly-invasive, unjustified searches for the type of job you are looking to fill, you’re likely violating laws and regulations related to the Federal Credit Reporting Act, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, or many others depending on your industry.On the other hand, if you are not doing background checks, you may be opening up yourself for lawsuits for negligent hiring. You’re not safeguarding your employees, your customers, or seniors and kids, from potential violence or abuse. You are playing Russian roulette with your livelihood and the livelihood of others! For instance, there is a case where a school in New Hampshire got sued by parents because they hired an ex-convict. Had they done a background check, they would have realized he was a convict. But they didn’t, and he assaulted one of the kids. The parents filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court of New Hampshire, and the offender was sentenced in November 2013, to 3-8 years in state prison, for convictions on charges of sexual assault and indecent exposure. This person already had a police record, and was discharged from a previous school in a different state for a similar offense. He simply went to another state, and got the same type of job again.If you are already conducting background checks, congratulations. You are taking a step in the right direction--but hold on a minute! Are you compliant with laws and regulations concerning how background checks should be performed, and do your processes discriminate without you realizing it? Are you aware of the potential mistakes and pitfalls?In 2013, a class action lawsuit alleged Domino’s Pizza was not providing denied applicants copies of their reports, and not separating the consent form from the application for employment. One of the applicants caught onto that, and it didn’t take them too long to identify the pattern and find others affected. That turned into an action group suit, ending when Domino's had to pay $2.5 million to a settlement fund.There are people who argue for stronger background checks legislation, while others say the checks are discriminatory. The thing to remember is that all background checks must be justified. For a driving job, for example, if the applicant is responsible for transporting people, then a driver motor vehicle record is justified. You don’t want them if they have a history of reckless driving, or driving under the influence. If you’re hiring for the medical field, then you want to make sure that licenses are valid, they’re verified, and that there hasn’t been any sanctions or penalties against them in a different state. You also want to do drug screening, because you don’t want someone under the influence to be responsible for injecting people with medications. They could inject patients with the wrong medication, mismatch prescriptions, provide an incorrect dosage, or inject themselves with the medication to get high!In most cases, even if you go to court, you have to be able to show that your hiring practices are not way out of line, or discriminatory. Background checks must be professional, and relevant to the essential requirements of future performance for that candidate. If you’re an employer, be aware of your placement of disclaimers, waivers, and how you compose authorization forms. Don't bury the important information in other text. Detail specifically what you’re going to do, what products you will use, and how. Make sure you get a good, valid signature from applicants who understand clearly what they are signing, and give them an opportunity to dispute the background checks results.By ensuring that your practices are fair, nondiscriminatory, and your paperwork is up to date, you greatly reduce your chances of losing a lawsuit. In in the book: The Business Immunity System-The Pitfalls & Side Effects of Data Handling, Privacy Issues, & Background Checks, I delve further into and help you demystify this topic.

Rachid Zahidi

This might not be the easiest/fastest way to get this done but I've always liked to actually call previous employers of anyone I'm hiring. It gets the job done and it allows you to learn more about your candidate then by simply paying some software company to serve you a list. I also found this reference that could help you out: http://wheniwork.com/hr

Jason Delodovici

Just Added Q & A:

Find solution

For every problem there is a solution! Proved by Solucija.

  • Got an issue and looking for advice?

  • Ask Solucija to search every corner of the Web for help.

  • Get workable solutions and helpful tips in a moment.

Just ask Solucija about an issue you face and immediately get a list of ready solutions, answers and tips from other Internet users. We always provide the most suitable and complete answer to your question at the top, along with a few good alternatives below.